Certainly has mixed reviews. I think we see him as back up stand-off.

He was disappointing but hard to form any opinion on just one game. You could have done worse than take a punt on Dane Chisholm. He has pace aplenty and a good short kicking game, but tended to go missing for large parts of the game though.

I've got mine but can you make sure I'm not tarred with the same brush as you

I think he'd be delighted to do that.

Indeed, heaven forbid anyone thinks he has an opinion of his own

I do often wonder how people like him get a job when the only response at interview is "baa", too many myopic Hull fans, killing the club and these message boards.

everybody entitled to there opinion, just ucking fed up people moaning and groaning whatever pearson or Radford do to help the club,if its that bad just uck of and go play somewhere else,there not perfect but goodness grief all some do is moan moan moan

what have they done to help the club?????

maybe you need to go play somewhere else?

Everybody IS entitled to their opinion, that's the default on an open forum, not that you would think so the way some posters on here throw their weight about and use insulting, deriding and inflaming tactics to bully people off!
I'm fecking fed up of people defending Pearson & Radford when in fact neither have actually done anything, quite the reverse in some cases, the owner made statements of intent he hasn't fulfilled in any way shape or form and as for Radford, well, far from perfect is an understatement of the millenia.
Some fans are happy with any old shiate, some of us are not happy with a steaming turd and make our feelings known. That isn't moaning that's stating the bleeding obvious (to all but the blind fans that follow and praise no matter what).

You keep saying things like this but I've seen little evidence of people defending Pearson, much less Radford.

In your eyes not slagging the club off on every thread make you a "cheerleader".

Aren't you supposed to be banned, Standee? Up to your old tricks again.