Ganson got the penalty wrong which enabled saints to level with us but all in all the decisions swung both ways,we should never have been in the position we were in when we were so far ahead but all credit to saints they dont give up.I just wish the back three for hull would make the call and catch the bloody bomb !!

Get over yourselves, like your the ones who get injuries....

You still had plenty of experience out there and lots of internationals, so I don't buy into all this we had a poor team out there because you didn't.

You'll never win at Wembley.

Ahh the wire fan who started supporting them around 2009 if wire start losing again will you go support saints, wigan or maybe man utd?

I don't think we can shoulder all of the blame on Mr Ganson. Sure he had a shocker, but everyone on here knows what Ganson is like, so when a game goes down to the wire the chances are he'll give a controversial decision.
Hull went in with a decent 1st half lead due to players individual skill, not team tactics. Once again it was 5 drives and a kick for pretty much most of the game. Saints played simple percentage football from the kickoff in the second half. Nothing fancy - a tactic as old as the hills. When you have so many inexperienced players in the team, its how youre gonna play it.
Hull had no guile to overcome it. A point lost today. We were out-coached.

I'm glad you think so. Seven of our players out there were 21 and under, and Nathan Ashe was on his first grade debut, having been plucked out of the u20s for this game. For us, that was a weakened side because of the number of inexperienced players we had playing at one go.

However, blaming Steve Ganson for the result is silly. Your team had an 18 point lead at halftime. They should have retained it. But they didn't. That wasn't Gansons fault. I don't think we had a single decision in our favour in the first half did we?

Good job Foster missed one of his kicks. Had he not done so, and with that belting penalty kick, we would have won. I think that's astounding. I wasn't expecting us to get anywhere near you today.

You're just bitter because we're a bigger club who win trophies and don't play 2nd fiddle to a 3rd rate football club in a 4th rate stadium.

Your lack of intelligence makes me feel very sorry for you and you clearly know nothing about rugby league

nuff said, jog on idiot!!

What are you talking about? Teams come back from half-time deficits plenty of times. The fact Saints played very well in the second half had a lot to do with but then so did a few dubious calls by Mr "look at me" Ganson.

What does a group of stars have to do with anything.

At last, some sense!

Sorry but if we have aspirations of being anywhere near the top 4 we should be able to finish a team off who are literally relying on the u20's to fill the squad. We used those self same injuries as an excuse for not competing in 2008/2009 and to a point in 2010. Yet when Saints have those injuries it is a different kettle of fish.

Good comparison made

Sure it was a weakened side but hardly a rubbish one was it ? You still managed to get a lot of internationals out onto the pitch!



I've not blamed him for the result, it was our own fault because we didn't defend a couple of kicks well enough and let Saints have a ten minute purple patch in which you punished us.



You obviously have not watched Hull FC play this season or for the matter the last three seasons. We play some of the most boring Rugby ever and are not exactly the brightest of teams about, I'm so shocked that you were even worried about the result ! We haven't scored 50+ points in over five seasons so why anyone would think we would blow you off the park is beyond me. Even Wakefield have scored 50 in a game this season and they even beat us at the KC quite comfortably.


Every team has injuries, its not like it was Hull's first choice line up either. We had Long and Phelps out which whilst it may not be an injury list of 7 or 8 players its in two pivotal positions.