That's really weak mate.

Understand this mate - your view isn't of any interest.

Garry Brindley - happy when Hull lose.

but true

im no fan of agar and would love to see him go tomorrow but i get bored of seeing posts everday, mainly by yourself being constantly negative about every aspect of our club, time to lay off for a while and give us a break- quite simply its boring!

Whilst we had a better balanced side out (Phelps fb, Whiting centre) and some much better individual performances, we were still rather poor as a team in many areas, and we are not a very fit side which leads to penalties and mistakes.

Sorry to bore you pal but there is a foe function I believe.

Give Agar stick when he deserves it but today it is not warranted.

Last time i looked it was a public forum so his view is of intrest.

Cant see your mods badge smartar$e.

So do people think that as a team we had a better attacking structure and better tactics, better bench rotation and better defensive technique? Or was it a case of individual players playing much better and at a higher intensity?

Whoever's decision it was to go for goal at 4-10 got it completely wrong. Hull had all the momentum and running the pen they could well have scored. I'd like to hear Houghton's view on the decision!
He threw the ball down in disgust!
Either Agar or Fitzgibbon need a talking to after that!
A converted try then and it was Hull's game as the final score suggests.

Problem with doing that is that you comment every thread with the same couple of lines - Agar can't talk to the media, I want us to lose etc etc, and so the thread doesn't make sense when it's happening that often!

The team is looking much better balanced with two players playing well at half back. Too early to judge Phelps he needs a game or two to settle with the new players around him. Westerman is the big mover for me thought he was excellent today really starting to find his feet.