Rommel should be let out of the sin bin,I could do with a laugh.

Earned on the basis of this season's performances one year is the right length.

Lee Radford - one of the most boring players ever to pull on a Black and White shirt - he went off and did his bit at Bradford - came back to Hull because it was the only JOB left for him - Fearless Warrior - give me a break

I actually threw up a little bit in my mouth when i read that.

Radders the prop is worth another year, played anywhere else we might as well go with 12. Really hope there was no pay increase as well. No offence to Radders but we need money to strengthen elsewhere.

That bloody island! Expro miles offshore with no lifeboat would be best I reckon

I wouldn't be too unhappy happy with a one year deal for Radford provided he is played at prop and prop alone. Loose forward should be a straight fight between Fitz and Washbrook IMO and Radford shouldn't even appear in the equation. Also he does need to cut out his suicide offloads.

Poor resigning imo .Dowes ,yes Radford No!

I would imagine the testimonial events would cover any short fall in that area.

Isn't there a Benefit game against Bradford in the pipeline for the next off season?

IIRC benefit games are usually at the end of a testimonial. I'm not sure how it would work as Radford (I think) can get a six month RL testimonial but Kirk Yeaman is due a 12 month testmonial starting next year after a decade at Hull.

Stan started his testimonial period with a pre-season game against Huddersfield , so Radford's Benefit may well start with such a match and the Yeaman's events ending with a game.

What the f'k have Yeaman or Radford done to deserve a benefit game, why can't the club stage a game for Help for Heros or some other organisation that genuinely deserves it, Yeaman has picked up £250K plus playing for Hull.

Yeaman's played 10 consecutive years in the first team at Hull FC. That's the way RL testimonials work. If the fans judge that he doesn't deserve it, they won't support his events.