10,997

I think when you.....sorry...if you watch it again you'll find you did very well only when warry had 12 men on the field, it wasn't the extra quality that eventually told it was having 13 on the field that told.

Plenty of effort from Hull, but not enough class. Horne was the best player on the pitch over the 80 minutes, unfortunately playing him at full-black limits our attacking options even further. Briers turned the game for Wire whereas our kicking game was third-rate. The good news is Thorman is out of contract at the end of the season.

Am sure uncle JS will sort that out.

Seeing as we had 13 on the field too, I think that would indicate that Warrington's 13 had more quality than us.

I would say dockers u 13 had more quality than us

No it means we looked better only when they had 12 on the pitch.

nice constructive reply.

Don't think he would touch you lot with an extreemely long barge pole.

Why would he? he is doing alright where he is.

Taking the first half performance into account when Lee and Houghton both kicked well from dummy half and the team played with some energy and enthusiasm I think Thorman is the main (not only) problem at the minute. His kicking is terrible, his defence is weak, his distribution is woeful and his vision no better than Stevie Wonder's! His poor kicking starved Hull of energy and territory and ultimately cost them the game.

With a class Seven Hull would have won today so I think there's more than a little over reaction on here tonight. I'm as disapointed as the next fan but don't talk about walking away etc. Just do it! No one is forced to follow Hull F.C. We all do it by choice. Personally if Hull ended up in the Conference i'd still follow them but that's just me. In any kind of weather so the song says.