I'm not the one making claims about cash cows.

Dunno, not my job to find one but if agar nearly managed it then there must be dozens around who could

I know, but without the full financial details then he is as likely to be right in his assumption as you are in yours. I think being chairman is kath's full time job isn't it? If it is I expect she's on a salary for the role

Quote Jake the Peg="Jake the Peg"I know, but without the full financial details then he is as likely to be right in his assumption as you are in yours. I think being chairman is kath's full time job isn't it? If it is I expect she's on a salary for the role'" www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?page_id=60 Just says Director on here.

Quote Jake the Peg="Jake the Peg"I know, but without the full financial details then he is as likely to be right in his assumption as you are in yours. I think being chairman is kath's full time job isn't it? If it is I expect she's on a salary for the role'" www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?page_id=60 Just says Director on here.

We've had this discussion before, and although it suits the agenda of some to claim that the board have a lifestyle to rival the Sultan of Brunei off the back of FC passholders, the maths doesn't work. We spend the cap and reportedly at least half a million to the SMC. How do we still manage to turn in a profit if the directors are syphoning off exorbitant salaries? Other clubs (Leeds apart) don't. Rule, Sutton and Flatman do full time jobs, so why shouldn't they be remunerated appropriately?

Actually the abbreviated accounts don't support his assumption at all. And I wasn't making any assumptions.

Millward, maybe not first off but in the long run we would be ok IMO.

It's all my mother's fault!!

I remember the discussion. You came up with a stack of fictitious amounts which supposedly backed up your claims that the directors aren't taking much out. I still believe that a business with a turnover of circa £5m, where the 3 biggest costs (players, stadium and stock for the shop) are less than £3m (probably substantially less) must either be making a decent profit or have other expense we don't know about.

The abbreviated accounts don't disprove his assumption either

Like Wigan, you mean, whose directors emoluments are zero, whose stadium rental is <£200k and who make a loss on bigger gates than we get? Righto.

Like wigan who were run as a sideline to whelan's beloved wigan athletic and who are now returning to profit because they are being run properly I mean