Who gives a we won't need access until february.

I never said poop.

On the planning front, they did originally put in for planning but the recommendation was to refuse, so they withdrew it and built it anyway saying they didn’t need permission, we received a letter from them saying they will vigorously defend their right to build it through the courts if we take planning enforcement.

I know that HCC have failed spectacularly for years, under both Labour and Liberal Democrat control, even the regeneration of the city has come at a cost, your pathetic attempt to belittle me by saying "grown up things" is as laughable as it is childish.

But hey, I never argue with idiots, they drag you down to their level, and proceed beat you with experience.

rlInglis sabre rattling...rl

Instead of sound bites and statements, why don't the Council [sizeDO[/size something...

Presumed dedication.

Most public rights of way have come into existence by way of presumed dedication. Presumed dedication refers to a long-established principle that long use by the public without challenge can constitute evidence that the landowner intended to dedicate the used route as a public right of way.

Presumed dedication can take place under either common law or statute law, which provide slightly different frameworks. Anyone who has evidence that a right of way has come into existence by statute or common law can apply for a Definitive Map Modification Order (DMMO) to have the right of way recorded on the definitive map.

The onus is on the person claiming a right of way to show that by the landowner’s conduct, or the absence of any action by the landowner to prevent the public from using the claimed route, it can be inferred that the landowner intended to dedicate the path to the public

As HCC is the landowner it should be easy to resolve.

Colin Inglis has some ideas about what the Council can do www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hul ... hip-596151

Colin Inglis has some ideas about what the Council can do www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hul ... hip-596151

Another boot in for the people of Hull. I've just come back from Hull Fair, every year since the stadium opened we have parked there with a blue badge for free, usually blue badge holders were allowed around the stadium bowl like at matches. Tonight we now have to pay £5 and park in the South Car Park with everyone else. Now before certain people kick off about how disabled people aren't exempt from charges, I absolutely agree, as its not about paying its about being able to park close to where I need to be, what I don't agree with is a fee charged this year when I'm not getting any closer than I did every other year without charge. Even the stewards weren't happy as they were getting complaints from a lot of disabled motorists and advised us to complain. I think I can take a guess as to who has moved the goal posts this year to make as much money as they can, but not advertised it anywhere.

If they are that desperate for money then you have to really pity them, I really can't imagine how sad, empty and pathetic the Allam's lives must be for them to be as petty as they are.

Can you imagine the planning warfare that would have ensued had the council gifted them the whole thing as many advocated?

"As stated in previous SMC statements this path is not a public right of way and this person had other ways of entering the stadium bowl if required."

Above quote from HDM web site. Don't like to state the obvious but so would someone with terrorist intent !!!!

You've more chance of being killed by a motorist in the UK many times over than you have of being killed by a terrorist, this is a fact. Indeed terrorist acts have being meted out by using motorvehicle a few times so why aren't the SMC blocking access to the stadium all all times for ANY motorvehicle given the high risk of death by such and potential terrorist attack?
Basically they've concocted some BS not backed up by any agency that deals with these matters because said agencies wouldn't say its closure negates a terrorist attack and the council are yet again shown to be weak as feck, incapable of being effective representatives of the people and not giving good value, not by a long chalk.

folk were hoping that 2017 would be a real cornerstone for the city and help build on what has being a very good year but a bit of tinsel and window dressing is no good for rebuilding the future, if the handling of the stadium and indeed many other aspects I see and experience for myself and hear about when i come back to my home city then KuH isn't going to flourish in the way people would have envisaged.

Where’s Webbo with his usual diatribe...!

Was there some sort of break clause after 25 years?