Don't know much about the recruitment process under Gentle and McRae and that's the first I've heard about Gentle wanting to get rid/replace Lineham.

Regarding Shaul, I was always under the impression that it was more that because we had Mcdonnell on the books that Shaul was second choice. To be fair at the time, Mcdonnell was a pretty good full back who we never got to see much of due to injury whereas Shaul was a young, raw, unproven talent. But as soon as Mcdonnell was injured Shaul was straight in the team. It would have been interesting to see what Gentle would have done once Mcdonnell was fit again but that's something we'll never know.

Gentle wanted to sign Nick Youngquest as he didn't think Lineham was ready.

Shaul nearly went to Union (Newcastle I think).

Think Radford fought in both cases to keep the players (Or give him a chance in Lineham's case)

Presumably in your world a "Radford lover" is someone who doesn't think he is a turd who should be shot.

Yawn...again for those without the capability to read and understand. ..that'll be you then, my turd comment was with respect to Radford's coaching ability and should be shot if he doesn't get us into the top four/cup final with this squad...if you think that means being killed then you have issues.
Now get back to studying English and ply your vindictive twisted crud elsewhere.

Should be shot if we don't get in the top 4 ? really,most on here thought 5/6 me included,

One other thing where do you get Radford lovers from? most again would have not choosen him but again are trying to be positive which is getting harder by the day,you are the deluded one am afraid

If being fickle is still supporting your club even when you have a turd in charge then I'm guilty, what fickle ISNT is having no faith in a coach whom is well, well out of his depth, has made more mistakes than you can shake a stick at and has moved us backwards over the last 20 months at an alarming rate...and then voicing your concerns, your obvious annoyance, questioning his ability to coach at the required level..ALL valid points when you look at the performances from said coach/team and in no way does that make fans fickle, that's truly pathetic from him.

You've won one game, instead of yapping on about stuff that you clearly can't even grasp, focus on the positives, focus on what you're going to do to win the next game and the game after that. IF you're so bothered Lee that you feel the need to spout on about fans whom don't want to attend games, it's because of the dross YOU, LEE RADFORD have served up, you haven't got an effing clue...RADFORD OUT..
Guilty as charged.

No..your interpretation. .a turd (of a.coach) in charge..turd referring to him being turd at coaching.
Yoir twisted interpretation. .but clearly I want him mirdered acvording to you...
However you ingerpret it it does not break thw AUP in any way unlike yoir posts which do regularly.

Keep digging.

Hajaha..okay yoi got me..what a warrior.
Keep to the theead dear boy because ypur losing the plot

...sounds like you've had one sherry too many.

A noun's a noun. An adjective's an adjective. You said Radford was "a turd" (noun), you can't just pretend you meant his coaching was "turd" (adjective), when you clearly labelled him a turd. There's no interpretation involved.

What's going on with your typing? Are you quite well?

Bumpy is a turd supporter the likes of which this club does not need.

Ignore the troll folks.