A sponsor less shirt- now that would be unique in this day and age! Loved that team shirt though, the match and the great atmosphere.The result,however, was not so good.

Well we did get that kit this year, which I am really pleased with. Shame about the sponsors, but it is a necessity for the club.

Why dont the Club get one tof worlds best designers in,make the shirt from the best material and charge £1000 and make it a right fashion statement... for gods sake it a rugby shirt to support your club and for the Club to make a few bob,got mine more than happy wont be going to weddings or official functions in it so dont really give a monkeys

What an absolute disgrace those shirts are, they are like seconds from Boyes.

Went in the shop today, the "V" doesnt line up from the shoulder panel to the front panel. Every shirt was different

You'd have thought for a £50 shirt you wear 20 times they could at least get that right

ISC, do one

I'd pay extra to have a shirt without the sponsors logos tbh, Vs with a large rectangular main sponsor logo never work aesthetically, but you have to accept that the club needs sponsors. I usually buy the training tops as I get more use out of them, last years were a bit naff however. Now if they'd bring out another fleece with zipped pockets as per a couple of years ago, something you can wear all year round.

Pretty good alternative to the hoops, and looks good with the dark shorts and socks.


Not sure about the look of the ladies fit - quite a high neckline.

Like the design.agree about the small sponsors. They would only need to be moved a tiny bit to sit in the v. The fact some one passed off shirt like that smacks of a "that will do attitude" which isn't on when your been charged £50. Overall nice kit though but would of liked irregular hooped socks or even just the white bit at top of socks. Agree can't have hoops every year but think we should incorporate it somewere even if it's a tiny detail on bottom of shirt/sleeves or shorts/socks. If not the away kit could have the hoops in a different colour like 2008.

First thing I noticed, not overly impressed with it but will wait until I try it on to decide.

As a sponsor, paying for the privilege, where would you want your logo to be? Prominently displayed on the Black of the 'V', or not quite so easy to see inside the 'V', on a white background?

I think is this case both would stand out more on the v

They are on the 'V'. Which was my point.

Don't really understand your point,sorry. My point was sponsors would of looked better if slightly moved so totally on the Black of the v and not overlapping. I think it's just little details like that and shirts in the past were sleeves don't match up with chest/back which stop the product looking like the quality the price tag demands.

Sorry. I misunderstood. I agree they are better in the 'V'.

I won't be buying one. Hopefully the away shirt will be better

I think it is! Different. But really smart