Where did I say it wasn't? I was merely questioning your opinion by pointing out that success teams don't necessarily have to have a coach who was a creative player.

but you can't have neither, as we have proven for the last 5 years!

Starting at 7 today for Donny

Wattsy starting as well as Colborn, HT Donny losing 2-8

Just seen a comment by a Donny fan who has been to the game" why did we pick miller, clearly not intrested" that's dissapointing if true he should have been busting a gut to show radders that he is wrong to drop him!!

He was not very good , poor kicking game , poor passing game & didn't seem interested.

poor, I would have expected better from him

If he wants to get back in our first team he will not get anywhere with that attitude, i thought he would do anything he could to try and prove Radford wrong but seems that is not the case at the moment

He was substituted , think that sums it up !

How longs he he got left on his contract wouldn't he be better just cut your losses and pay him off

It's not his attitude, it's his ability

be surprised if he gets back in.our halfback options are getting worse.

Bang on jake.

Disappointing if it's true. I thought maybe Horne's poor performance last night may have spurred Miller on to put in a good shift.

wonder whether someone who has never played but been a studier of the game would work, someone similar to mourinho in football. Trouble with rugby people is 90% of them are thick. Just because you've won stuff as a player under the best coaches doesn't mean you'll be any good. Creative players generally struggle to tell others how they do it as it's usually a natural ability and too easy for them . In most sports the true greats make poor coaches.