Ok Then Jacob Miller

There seems to be something in the rules under the "Ongoing Assessment of a Club’s Aggregate Liability" section.

Quote: Ongoing Assessment of a Club’s Aggregate Liability "At any point during the Salary Cap Year, where a Club wishes to commit itself to any transaction, or to conduct itself (by act or omission) in any manner, which varies its Aggregate Liability, the Club must first provide to the RSCM written details of the proposed transaction or conduct, and evidence of the impact that such transaction or conduct would have on its Aggregate Liability. In no circumstances is the Club permitted to proceed with such transaction or conduct without the RSCM’s express written approval. '"

With one of the examples shown here

Quote: Ongoing Assessment of a Club’s Aggregate Liability "6.1.2 Where the proposed transaction is the termination of a Playing Contract with one of the Club’s existing Players, as part of which the Club proposes to make a new payment (in a lump sum or in instalments) to the Player that was not provided for in his Playing Contract or other arrangements (and therefore was not previously included in the calculation of his Salary Cap Value) (the “Termination Payment”), then the information provided to the RSCM must include a proposed compromise agreement between the Player and the Club (usually in the form of the RFL’s standard compromise agreement as drafted from time to time) setting out full details of the agreement reached, including full details of the Termination Payment. '"

Again it is at the discretion of the RSCM. I seriously hope we as a club are not hedging our bets on the RFL being sympathetic to our cause. Also do we want to be seen as the club that will get rid of players pretty quickly. It has 2 effecs on the club.
1, Players can come for an easy payday know if they fail to perform they will be hoofed out with a nice settlement.
2, Players will not want to come with the pressure of knowing the club have a habit of binning players who do not fit in.