Call them what you will but lacking cofidence will never be one of them

Quite.

No chance of the status quo being restored now.

Problem is that their confidence maybe justified in this case as reading between the lines the SMC agreement does favor FC compared to City.

This is all part of the plan of isolating the minority of FC fans to achieve the end goal.

So all the time we were being told that we made no money from the concessions that was untrue? Or at least not quite true if we have a guaranteed flat income regardless of sales.

Two points to bear in mind here:

1. The SMC has always been owned by the owners of City. Regardless of how good or bad the deal is, no money actually changes hands.
2. If the deal for City is that bad, why not change it? See point 1.

When the SMC was set up, it had to be capitalised, this was at £2mill

Pearson, Wilkinson (the internet backer) and the Healey's were involved in the setup.

Divide and conquer, something I've witnessed first hand over the last 3 years or so.

I'll pay 300.00 so there pictures stay down, must have missed there concert too

As i got told,

Say in the last year at Boulevard the club made £70k over the bars.

SMC would give us £70k "from the bars take"

Now if the bars are not taking enough to cover this then its their fault for charging £3.70 for a can of beer.

Rich said every meeting "we will have "AT LEAST" the same income as Boulevard, is guaranteed, we might get more, but never less"

I knew about Pearson and Wilkinson but wasn't aware of the Healey link. Is this common knowledge.

We have only heard one side of the story and then the Allams are changing their statements day by day. We still have to hear APs side of the story, so i for one will reserve judgement.

Initially I would have agreed with you, however I am now not so sure.
The uproar started earlier in the week as people noticed that the pictures had been removed, I suspect hundreds of e-mails were sent all over the shop (and quite rightly so), however it now transpires AP knew about this last summer &ordered the pictures of our great legend to be taken down over a few hundred quid.

I wonder if the same level of anger will be directed at AP for this decision ? will he be bombarded with hundreds of e-mails questioning why this has happened ?, I very much doubt it tbh.
We may not actually be the victims or the innocent party in all this, which is a worry thought tbh.

We have only heard one side of the story and then the Allams are changing their statements day by day. We still have to hear APs side of the story, so i for one will reserve judgement.

Doesn't matter what he says, only FC fans will pay any attention to the fine detail. If you had a quick poll of 100 people in the city this morning you will probably find only the diehard FC fans among them will have any sympathy for us.