Yet the only people who can make a decision in football are the ref and his linesman irrespective of a million different camera angles and digital images.
In Rugby League our refs are miked up to an official in the stands, we have in-goal officials and for TV games we have video refs. We really arnt that amateurish.
Granted they still get stuff wrong.

All I'll say is, thank god it wasn't on tv

Sorry i meant amateurish in the coverage and highlights sense, you only have to look at the super league show to see this, it never has a regular spot and the only extended highlights they show are the games that have been on sky then the rest of the games get a few minutes just to show the tries, how many times at a game do you see a contentious decision and think i carnt wait to see that again on tv and they dont even show it or even mention it sometimes.

If we had half the coverage that most sports get we wouldnt have these was it wasnt it threads every week.

We would still have the was it wasn't it threads, football has a million angles, 3d zoomable recreations and they still manage to make a weeks radio out of one decision. I do agree about the sl show timeslots and coverage in general being poor.

That is just after match analysis by over paid pundits, it has absolutely nothing to do with the game itself.

The refereeing (in goal referees, tv replays etc etc) is far superior to football!

That must be why Gleeson, Rule and a Solicitor were all travelling down to London today, closing their laptops and hiding paperwork whenever someone walked past

Ah so thats were he was, someone should have told them 4 blokes who were looking for him !

I imagine he will be at home watching a movie right now. 'House Party'