so did whiting

Not knocking him by the way, just not the best example to choose.

Not at all just that Leeds and Saints fans give better advice.

I was at the same ends as you and could see bugger-all.

With eyesight like yours, it's a wonder we wasted so much on the Hubble telescope

I disagree, Whiting has far more talent as a rugby player than Washbrook could ever hope to have. Washbrook has a step and a dummy which ends in him running back into troubleand sod all else . He's very average.

Whiting has that thing most lacking in our team of late - a brain!

Are you schizophrenic? Or a ref?

Far from average, but im not going to get back into the Washy v Whiting debate again. Simple fact is, Whiting is behind Washy in the pecking order and as i said, will be lucky to play unless we get injuries. (thats not me saying i dont rate Whiting, its just locigcally he doesnt fit into the 17 with the other players we have)

I see Washy in a similar situation to Rich Horne. Due to injury or playing out of position or whatever he hasn't exactly been pulling up trees in his performances in the last 12-18 months and it's the likes of him and Horne who need to start making things happen on the pitch and playing to the level that many people claim they are at.

Agree at this stage that he will be chosen ahead of Whiting.

I fail to see how, when we've struggled so badly for players with brains over the past few years, the player with the best RL brain at the club (Long aside) wouldn't get in the 17 if some people had their way.

[url=http://www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk/JCP/index.htmlHe'll be needing this[/url