Out of his depth, stick him at full back and get Tommy Lee at 7, at least he puts the effort in.

i've said just the same on the other thread, people slag Webster off because he's a Rovers legend..but at least he could lead a side, and we had few other options after we paid Dykes off so late in the year.

as for Thorman, i'll happy drive him back to Huddersfield.

Think that's the best of a bad situation at the minute!

he had one good game at Bradford and thats it, and thats probably only because Bradford are so slow they make Thorman look like Usain Bolt!

Watching tonight it seemed that most sets he only saw the ball on the 5th tackle. Maybe that's why he sometimes kicks through early in the count regardless of whether or not we have runners, he just assumes it must be the last because he's received the ball.

He's one of the worst signings we've ever made.

Thorman fullback
Lee 7 where he was meant to play originally. fooks sake

That's because he goes and hides as soon as we get possession. I have never known a scrum half be so little involved as he is when his side has he ball.

anyone see thorman storm off at the end after a slangin match with tickle on the last tackle???? no handshakes to be had from chris....pressure getting to him, utter garbage...makes you think if there is unrest in the camp....

Obviously I wasn't there but I heard little of Brough but plenty of Drew, would Richard Horne have made a difference tonight?

Possibly, but even with the 9 missing players in, we create nothing from 7 and Horne's a runner.

Totally agree. I don't think I made the point very well in my post, but you're exactly right. It's the fact he doesn't look to get the ball and take charge, not just that we don't look to involve him.