just like all the other players we move to replace injuries instead of moving up youth we sign up to full time contracts!!

He seems to be a lot heavier than when he played for Cas.

The reason for that will be agar draining any ball playing skills out of him so agar can turn him into the next ewen dowes

His defence has been poor 2 games running now but if we can get him playing in his correct position with the ball in hand we will see more from him. Too early to write him off yet IMO and thats from someone who was not convinced of the signing in the first place.

He must of looked like a lamp-post at cas then, there's feck all on him.

So lets get this right,if Westerman plays 13 instead of 11 or 12 he'll be a better player?
Regardless of the fact at Cas he never played the traditional 13 role,or that 90% of clubs don't use use the 13 in a traditional sense, instead using them as an extra backrower.

I've not seen anything from him at Hull or Cas over the last two years,that elevates him above anything we already had,imo A TOTAL WASTE OF MONEY.

It's that new widescreen tv his local pub has just bought in Cas. Still in black and white though.

Not a 2nd rower, simple as that. It's the same situation as Washbrook.

I can't get my head around Agar seeming to think Westerman isn't ready for 13 at this stage of his career, but touting his ability to play 6 if necessary which has even more responsibility. So, 2nd row it is then. Farcical.

Bang on the money .

More proof of Agar's incomprehension.

We're playing a loose forward in the 2nd row to accomodate a prop at loose forward, with one 2nd rower currently at centre and another playing 15 minutes at prop from the bench, whilst another loose forward is also playing from the bench, but either in the 2nd row or prop, I'm not entirely sure which he was supposed to be. It's madness.

It would be comical if it wasn't true!!