The question is would Wynne get in to the 17 of sides like St's, Wigan, Leeds, Warrington, Huddersfield and the most likely answer is no. I think he's a decent enough player to be a squad player but his temperament/attitude may well hold him back.
Its all well and good wearing your heart on your sleeve but not at the detriment of the team and too often the good stuff that Wynne does is over shadowed by his loss of self control, and we have too many players that give dumb pentalies away as it is.

He's probably not been helped by what seems to have been a total lack of professionalism running through the playing and coaching teams the past few years.

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... ct-8254517 Looks like we have a clause in Brown's contract meaning he'll be here in 24

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... ct-8254517 Looks like we have a clause in Brown's contract meaning he'll be here in 24

Looking at that list of players out of contract the number I’d keep doesn’t even hit double figures. Even one or two of those have to have big seasons and play more games than they miss to earn a new deal.

I don’t think anything other than a big change & clear out in the squad at the end of this season will make a difference.

AP & TS have to be ruthless and not sentimental with retentions this year.

Agree. Mammoth rebuilding job.

Anybody know who our top earners are who are ooc?

And how their wages earned vs performance stacks up, as these are the ones id be moving on asap. If were smart we could make 2 top second row and prop signings, but not overly xonfident with our ability to identify players with good ability and with the correct mentalities

Taylor, Shaul, Houghton, Griffin surely releases a chunk up, and foe me as the seniors in this squad theyve failed miserabally recently in showing leadership and effort, looking forward to seeing the back of them now.

Scott, wynne, Mcnamara, Lane and Fash, Savelio, Lovodua, Evans wouldnt be far behind depending on contract status.

Lane sill has 2 more years left so unless someone comes in for him , It will be difficult to move him on .

I was surprised yesterday to read a piece by Dan Tomlinson saying the the club had knocked back Wakefield with regards them wanting to take Shaul back on loan.

I think it's more to do with the fact Wakey pulled out of any potential deal last season due to Poaching getting sacked .
Left shaul and the club in limbo a bit .

I get that Wakey pulled out seemingly last minute after it was all agreed but would have thought the club would've taken the opportunity to move out a player that has no future at the club, rather than continue to pay to have him sit in the stand. Its not like we will get many takers for the players we want/need to move on.

I agree Chris hardly makes any commercial sense

Why strengthen one of our rivals though , on the last 2 games looks like we’ll be up against wakey this season so why let players go to them .

Can't see it being us, but wouldn't say no to Kruise Leeming.

Can see him back at Hudds with them getting Peats on a short term deal

Houghton to coaching staff and Leeming in ?

Rumours he's off to the NRL.....

He is a good SL player, not sure he is good enough for the NRL.

I'd take him, release Lovodua and Shaul, bring in a overseas backrower.