Possibly because this season his main responsibility was defense

becuase it wasn't his job to coach attack

Great attitude that would have been, probably his first word to Pearson too. 'I do the defence boss, it's not me'. Classy.

I'd be happy to watch a team full of heart playing some half decent rugby.
The rest will take care of itself.

The disgruntled are apparent.

Ultimately Radders may show his limitations as were glaringly apparent under our ex-coach.

Clean slate and all that for me.
Hope Radders goes well like I hoped PG would.
Massive pressure on him from the get-go.
It appears some knives are already sharpened on here.

Yes.

What would be a major improvement, our mentality against the 'lesser' teams.

AP said, when the 16/19's started training, with the first team, the first team was shocked, of the intensity of training of the 16/19's

Just before he was 100% certain that he was staying?

Acceptable return for me would be an improvement in the consistency of our weekly performances and a sign that our attack is improving. I would even accept a lower placed finish next season if it meant that the team are starting to gel on the pitch.

Another one prepared to give Radford an easier ride than Gentle had.

A lower placed finish would mean we were less consistent. If the team are 'starting to gel', we should win more games and finish the same or higher. 6th with a higher points return is the absolute minimum he must deliver.

What if other clubs (Salford, Saints and Hkr) are stronger?

You're really ed aren't you?

Why shouldn't Radford have the same leeway as Gentle? PG wanted his squad and he and McRae built it. They put together some truly appalling performances with his team. Allow Radford at least a year before you all start creating terrible, rudimentary MS Paint avatars.