Seems pretty direct to me. You're saying Yeamo should have first choice on which side he plays because he has achieved more in a longer career. Why shouldn't that be taken literally? We'll take everything you post with a pinch of salt, then... oh wait, I already do.

More like a hasty toe-scraping backpedal, methinks.

I'm gutted my posts don't get your approval, honest.

Assuming you're capable of debating the point, which I'm not sure about to be honest, where do you stand on the playing players out of position argument? Because Yeaman is only really comfortable playing on the left, whereas Crooks has shown an ability to play both sides. Now given they're our only two fit centres, where would you play them? Yeaman plays, he should play left.

So Yeaman should metaphorically pick which side he plays?

Are you thick? The issue isn't about where Yeamo plays, it's about you claiming he should have the choice, not Gentle. And then saying you didn't mean it and only idiots should believe what you post. You got the last bit right, of course.

It's obvious what he meant: Gentle puts two pieces of paper with the words 'left' and 'right' on them into a hat, and Yeaman pulls one of them out to determine where he plays.

Anybody willing to take a bet that he won't play on the left?

Yeaman on the left picks itself, the same way it has done for every coach, SL or internationally, for ten years.

For all your trumpeting, I haven't heard one single argument as to why he shouldn't play there.

Do you think he won't play on the left?

I should imagine it'll be on the left but it will be Gentle's decision.

That's what he meant when he posted yeaman picks which side he plays at.

Ah. Thick it is, then.