Not really, he's told us that all interviews etc. Will be done through KCFM, it's only a case of turning a dial.
Although it does seem silly to ban a full station because of 1 trouble causer.

Lets kick Peter Levy's head in

Their commentary team for rugby league is:

Gwilym Lloyd - Rovers
Chris Park - Rovers
Nick Pinkney - Rovers
Lee Richardson - fairly balanced
Craig Murdock - FC

To his credit, Lloyd does usually attempt to be even-handed but there are times when he gets carried away, like the Dobson drop goal at Odsal which he described in terms more appropriate to a last minute GF winner. Other than Murdock (who incidentally is the best commentator and analyst of any of them, despite his FC bias, IMO) they do all see the world through Rovers eyes.

Puffy and bloodshot?

Shame for East Hul RLFC, Grand final tomorrow and the coach banned from talking about it.

TBH Suzie, I think the sports programme is absolute drivel - I never listen to it. I was really referring to the after match interviews and daily sports summary (which I didn't make clear) rather than that idiotic nightly programme.

KCFM seems to have cut back on its daily sports bulletins - the 6:30 & 7:30 ones have now disappeared (as has the news that precedes it). The hourly news now seems to be outsourced, and the sports summary they have on after this quite often has mistakes in it, and in my opinion is pretty poor. RH's news summaries during the day were usually better reported (and I'm sure Burnsy wasn't involved in these).

All we'll get now from RH is the usual snide, schoolboy comments, as per usual. Wonder it Mike White will stick his point of view on here though - he's made some impartial comments in the past.

I don't think it makes a difference who they support. If your colours made a difference to the job you do i'd have serious worries about several members of the Hull side in the derbies.

And the problem here is...

There is a world of difference between what fans can think and even say in private, and what is acceptable or (in extreme cases) lawful to broadcast. Burns had every right to express his distaste for the signing of Reardon, but the manner in which he chose to do it crossed the first line and came very close to the second.

However, as I've said earlier, there are proper channels to use if an individual or organisation feel they have been slighted by the media and IMO we should have pursued them more fully rather than taking this tit-for-tat action.

Have you actually listened to them?

Nice avatar.

Keeping up with the news isn't a strong point of yours, is it?

That's strange because Radford is on now talking about it.