Sh!!!t..... that's gone in my letter of complaint aswell

Only a 'mild embarrassment' according to Dobbins! Would love to see a strong embarrassment!

IF we win tomorrow, it is going to be pretty sweet afterall this cheating.

Although now I have calmed down I am pretty sure that we would have known Dobson was in.

Cockayne

But... but... but...

Dobson hasn't been allowed to train with Rovers whilst he's been de-registered, has he?!!!

Nice to see Rovers have took off the story off their site about the 8000 willie flags they had in stock to turn the kc red

Oh and thank you rovers mods for the ban with no explanation, you are as bad as your club

I think certain members of the RFL need to be investigated? They have been too quiet over this matter,and have made RL look a joke.They stated,at the time,that Dobbo,could only be re-registered,once Mason's passport came through.As things stand,it hasn't and Rovers should be made to keep Mason,over Dobson,until it is finally sorted.People may say about Mason been de-registered,to accommodate a return for Dobson,but the RFL's statement clearly said that he could only return once Willie's 'tongan' passport came through only.Does anyone else think that his tongan passport was NEVER going to materialise?

I really really hope Mason planned this, using Rovers to get to Europe to end up in France RU.

I hope Rovers get no compo

All that cash to Mason, 17.5 replica shirts sold, tickets sales slumping


Yes Rovers Mason raped you

What ,you will be telling me there is no Santa Claus next.

Sorry mate,but that is still out of order.Dobson won`t be fully fit anyway,so what actualy is the problem with him playing?
Our team should be above worrying about him anyway.

The whole thing stinks. Can only assume the RFL were too far committed in their deals with Hudgell to block the re-registration because of the non-materialisation of the passport. After all, as far as the RFL was concerned, the passport arrival was guaranteed - I'm sure they were led to believe it was actually en route before agreeing to the de-registration and the caveats for re-registration cooked up with Hudge.

I reckon this particular scenario was probably not considered, so the RFL were not in a position to refuse the re-reg on this basis.

All complete speculation, but I bet that Rovers' stock with the RFL is only fit to make potato peelings soup at the moment. The final line of the RFL statement reeks of undertones to support this


... something they didn't feel was necessary to make clear last time.