if you read my posts properly i did say we do call the ref, but not constantly moaning at every decision from minute 1 to minute 80 like yesterday!

as for saints and kr, if you have visited these grounds its constant forward or boooo with the latter

but to make it easier, maybe some wakefield fans should learn the rules of the game and also tell me what opticians they use seeing as they can spot a forward pass or offside whwen the play is up the other end of the pitch

Shouting forward, booing, slow claps, shouting abuse at the ref happens at EVERY RL game. It happens at the KC each week, the Wigan fans earlier this year were taking the mick of us shouting forward every other pass.

Arguing whose fans are better or worse at something is one of the most futile exchanges you ever read on RLFans. Plus Bren is just wining you up, and you keep biting.

Spoilsport.

I sat in that stand, possible the most biased supports I have heard in a while, in the first half they was something wrong with every try we scored.

I reckon the average age was about 75 though, they were good people though and had a laugh with them in the end, gave Hull loads of credit.

I reckon if every decision was looked at, we would see that a very high percentage are correct. The problem, as has been identified on previous threads, and particularly so with the Wigan Hudds game. Is that there is no consistency, and what is given as a penalty in one moment, is ignored in another.
They did get the Sneyd conversion one wrong though.

I always find wakey fans to be very balanced - chips on both shoulders most of 'em

It's like the RL equivalent of small man syndrome. Strange how cas fans are from the same town and they're generally OK

Well done Jake. You've shown them how to make a funny!!

"Them"?

The man held motionless was trying to offload and had his arm free when Ellis hit him. Or was he supposed to stand there and watch?

This has been blown up out of all proportion. Talanoa suffered a worse hit by Ablett on Friday and no, I wasn't up in arms about it. Neither did our chairman embarrass himself on social media.


He needs to join the very long queue of people hacked off at the ineptitude and outright bias of the panel. It's hardly exclusive for Wakefield to suffer ridiculous decisions. Tonight's is just another example in fact.

How I saw it. Never ever in a million years was pritchard to Shaul forward. That would of taken the score over 50.plus the goal that was but wasn't takes it to possibly 54. So being a bit tighter for that spell really could of hit 60 odd. Either way I've never ever ever seen a team score 40odd points keep a side to 4 points in the 2nd and be anything other than dominant

Or how a team which makes less than 1000 metres in a game deserves anything but a hammering. Had our defence not gone to sleep in that 2nd 1/4 the scoreline would have been more reflective of our dominance

If my grandma had balls she'd be my grandad, so what's your point?