Which bit's untrue?
Financial risk - see the going concern note in the filed accounts
Did Adam issue a rallying call? Er, yes.
Did fans respond? I think so if season pass and merchandise sales of recent years are anything to go by
Has Lee Radford galvanized the squad since the days of Agar and Gentle? Team spirit and togetherness are consistently cited by players as a key factor in our success.
We won back to back at Wembley, right?
I think you've seen reports about the financial benefits of Australia.

No need to try and get round the swear filter. Reasoned arguments are a more mature way to respond I think.

Kelly is the only player in our squad who when attacking with ball in hand puts fear in the opposition.
Clueless attack is borne out by our inability to break down a defence in the opposition 20 despite repeat sets and relying in the main on a kick to the corner.

I've not mentioned once, Kelly been our only attacking threat . I actually think we've plenty of strike , if used correctly , I think Connor can unlock a defence as good as anyone, for me must start, Carlos is as skilfull as they come , and snyed's kicking game can be outstanding, when our forwards are on top. I'd just like to see our backs used more in midfield and and more off loads from our forwards with Shaul supporting , we do and have looked pretty obvious for sometime now . Andy doesn't really weaken my argument , if anything proves my point , we lost all 3 of the games you mentioned, our attack struggles against decent opposition, I don't really think it's an argument, I think most on here can see our attack as been pretty poor for a while now

You mean utilising Sneyd's attacking kick ability to hit our best aerial attacking player in Talanoa? Sounds a reasonable attacking ploy IMO.

I agree that we are in the slightly unusual position from a Hull perspective of actually having talent and skill in our backs but through injury/idiocy not being able to get anywhere near our best pack on the park to lay a platform for them. Even discounting the Watts scenario, have we been able to have:

Taylor
Houghton
Paea
Mini
Manu
Bowden

on the field as a unit for many games? If we could get closer to that it would be a help.

You, Bumpy, Seb... you should buy a pea green boat and leave true fans alone, but you wont, it's amazing what you can PRETEND to be behind a keyboard.

What deception on my part are you implying here?

Is this person seriously suggesting that you and the others are not true fans. He's soon reverted to showing his true colours.

I disagree. People bleat on about having one structure so that when you have an injury you directly slot in a player from the academy. This is what we've done with Lane, but the fact is he's 19 and inexperienced, probably at least 5-7 years off his peak so the quality of the squad is automatically diluted when he replaces Manu/Mini - no disrespect to him at all. When you have multiple players out obviously this becomes more difficult. I think the plan b scenario is more important when we miss one or more of Shaul/Kelly/Houghton in the spine and try and accommodate Miloudi/Connor/Abdull/Washy there instead, which has been the case a lot this year, but in my opinion less so in the pack.

As opposed to saying Ellis has contributed nothing so far. #intheknow

You mean calling someone clueless after being yet again attacked on the forum when they were so far off the mark despite being given a bundle of evidence to disprove what they were saying it was actually accurate?
Think you'll find it's you and others who start throwing the abuse and goading when you don't like what's written.
You're a sad act who couldn't wind up a watch, as soon as one enters into a debate about rugby all you can come back with is inane responses, it's your level after-all but pathetic all the same.
You even called me a racist pig, forget that did you!

So you don't throw around abuse but I'm a sad act, pathetic and not forgetting a racist but you're the one under attack?

I seriously believe you have mental health issues.