That’s what I thought when he answered me ?
His response doesn’t make sense !?

It's a blumin good job we beat Rovers, otherwise there would be being a witch hunt. Whatever happened, I hope lessons have been learnt.

I don't see how that can be the case. As per the operational rules the ban is effective from the day of the hearing. If he is indeed still banned, it has to be because of the reserves stuff that was mentioned previously on the thread.

There still hasn't been any mention of any of this from the club yet.

Surely hes either banned for any games so the rovers one would be included or hes only banned for reserve games so why cant he play first team? Ridiculous from the rfl as ever.

I cant see how the rovers game cant be included. If he was available to play that game then surely hes available for any first grade game?

It's your original post that doesn't make sense (wrong is more accurate), the hearing was NOT after the derby.

SOL missing for Wigan, but his replacement Smithies is one hell of a player, Yorkshire lad as well. I hope the confusion over Albert is resolved in our favour, but it looks like he’s out for this game.

Smithies would have played anyway wouldn't he?

He’s been coming on after SOL first stint usually. He likely do the full 80 now.

Widnes player Kenny Baker was suspended for 1 match by the revue panel on the same day (6th Feb) as Kelly, but played the following weekend (9th Feb) and then missed the game on the 16th Feb due to suspension.

For anyone heading over on Sunday, Wigan have a new [url=https://www.wiganwarriors.com/news/2020-02-19-fan-zone-hull-fcFanzone[/url this year at Robin Park Arena. Open to home & away fans, just need to present your match ticket.

Probably too embarrassed knowing someone has made an error not knowing the rules.
Not a good situation if you want to play first team players in the reserves

Expect a significa....oh, hang on.

We spend money, but the club is amateur in the extreme.