Did the first guy say anything about whether there was an odd bottle. Who dobbed the good boy Ched in cos it was not the girl cos she was drunk, You males can try as much as you can but it was RAPE under English law. Get over it and let the scrote get on his life he is not the greatest Footballer in the world. 1st division of English Football give me a break.

Apparently nobody made an allegation of rape.
This was taken of the website mentioned earlier.

So 12 men a true find him guilty . We are ed as a nation over one Lower Rank Footballer. I worry #charlie

No one is preventing him continuing his career. No one apart from Ched Evans and his knuckle-dragging apologists that is.

It has taken him until today to show even a shred of contrition and that was issued begrudgingly. He hasn't asked for the support website to be taken down and his happy to sit back and allow his "supporters" to continue to vilify the REAL victim in this case. In case it passed you by, that victim IS NOT Ched Evans.

My advice to him would be to consider a career away from football. Can you imagine the reception he will receive from opposition supporters? I just hope that he is also receiving professional counselling.

He could always ply his trade abroad, were it not for the fact that as he still hasn't served his whole sentence, he is not allowed to travel abroad. He hasn't "done his time", he's only done half of it.

City are in danger of breaching the fair play cap. Budget isn't the word. Ched's about all they can afford, I reckon.

Plus his girlfriend Natasha is a good friend of Amy Bruce, of course, according to social media.

Evans Stevens. Unwelcome to Hull, munChed.

Don't agree with what he's said but I'd die fighting for his right to say it.
JE SUIS CHARLIE.

This is where people are getting mixed up. A profession in which you hold a position of trust (doctor, nurse, teacher) is not comparible to being a footballer.
All the witch hunt mob will do is turn Evans in to the victim. There are people playing football that have killed before, where's the outcry about them? Ones even captaining his club.

He was given legal advice to not speak. Why should he apologise for something he's adamant he hasn't done, would you?
He has completely distanced himself from those that have vilified the girl and apologised for the hurt caused by events that night.
He has a right, as does every other person to rehabilitation. Part of that is being allowed to resume his career. Making rehabilitation conditional is not a path we should go down, under any circumstances.

As I said, his guilt is not the issue for me, the very laws that convicted him also say he has a right to be rehabilitated.

Listening to bruces' comments I wonder if he had watched question time on Thursday night as one of the panelists made virtually the same comments

...or maybe he reads rlThe Telegraph.rl

1865, please stop trying to be inflammatory. I was only responding to your sweeping statement that anyone has the right to resume their career.

Have you read the transcripts yet then sheeple???? Or are you going to come out with an educated opinion or just carry on talking b0llocks???

Rehabilitation is a right. Showing you the flaws in your argument is not inflammatory.

Rehabilitation isn't a right. It's a courtesy given by a civilised society. Expecting to be defended against a dangerous convicted criminal is a right.

I didn't propose an argument, I questioned your statement. There is a difference. If your comprehension skills cannot recognise that, then that is not my problem. You made a statement, I questioned it, which you've still not answered. Do I need to copy and paste it as a quote?

You never questioned my statement, you proposed a situation which you know could never happen and tried to compare it to the Ched Evans situation, just because I didn't make clear that he has a right to resume his career because he's not barred from his profession like a teacher, nurse etc. would be. Although I must admit, I did assume most rational people would be intelligent enough to make that distinction. In your case, I won't make that error again.