If FC are determined to dispense with the 3, I think Wilf hit the nail on the head, in saying, we could just deregister them and AP pay the wages out. This keeps them off cap. Probably force their hand in moving on too, if they are the consumate professionals. Still think they have been hard done to, irrespective of who signed them etc.

I'd be prepared to give Arundle a shot, he has speed to burn and is a player we can work with, out of the three his attitude has being second to none. Sent a message when we played against him and is the only one who has made noises about coming back and wanting to prove his worth.

Maybe the club should look at renegotiating his deal. He won't earn what he does now at another club, so will be in his best interests to do that.

If these three are on the sort of wages some people claim they are I'm not sure AP could afford to throw that much money away.

I also think Arundel may still have something to offer.

It could be a smart move on his part to offer to reduce his terms as it would show he is committed. However if Radford just doesn't fancy him it would probably be a waste of time.

It seems neil has eased your worries about gleeson mrs b, feel better now do you ?

Well he's not quite agreeing with the Hudge! seems like a colourful character our Mr G www.newsnow.co.uk/A/735032041?-4338:2393:t Reading Mr Hudgells epistle it looks like Mr Caro has been a bit economical with the truth as well!

Well he's not quite agreeing with the Hudge! seems like a colourful character our Mr G www.newsnow.co.uk/A/735032041?-4338:2393:t Reading Mr Hudgells epistle it looks like Mr Caro has been a bit economical with the truth as well!

Twitter is always better when you read back what you've written and think before clicking return, but then we wouldn't have that glorious response

So too is unnecessarily cc'ing people into emails. I know someone who did that. It cost him his job and he ended up in court.

Out of the three i'd possibly keep Arundle.. He looked good before he got injured. I think that's his downfall, he's too injury prone and it always seems to happen when he picks up form.

You mean he should take less cash for more years? Less cash alone would show he should be committed. Contracted to 2016, so he need be in no rush.

been in bother myself on that score. However, the reply all is also a great function to slam dunk the original senders efforts to be a pi1ck and copy every man and his dog in!

No I just meant he should offer to take less money for the reminder of his contract in the hope of getting back into the team.