That's just saying they don't want him in the 17 but they know he's contracted.

Whats a contract,,,they mean nothing.

Well they do.

Really....just like Mckinnons,Ellis and O'carrolls did.....dont talk $hite man.

How am I talking ?

Of course they mean something! Those players will have come to a mutual agreement with the club, they can't just leave and the club can't just say "off you pop".

Cookes "contract" meant a lot didnt it....contracts mean nothing nowadays...players can get out of them if they want.

Oh good one example nobody knows the finer details of.

The fact they have to get out of them means they mean something.

The salary cap means clubs are more likely not to put up a fight but if they want they can dig their heals in (eg Carvell).

If contracts didn't mean anything why we looking to pay transfer fees?

We seemed to have played a blinder this season clearing bad contracts, rumours are agreement is in place to clear Seymours at the end of the season too. It can be done but costs money, if you offer the player a lump sump and they have a deal in place at another club they will make more money, ie Ellis and O Carroll. I remember Gentle thanking AP for stumping up the money to pay Obsts contract off at the beginning of the year.

We could have paid nothing to get rid of Ellis and O'Carroll, regular first team rl and a pay rise at their new clubs could have been enough.

It's when there not wanted by another club and they don't want to leave it becomes a problem, if you can't come to a agreement (Dykes) and can't find a law abiding reason to sack them (Hutch) and want room on next years cap you have to pay them off in full.

whats keeping mike bernett out?

Lack of talent?!!

I agree, but however we did it, we have done well to clear those bad contracts. I suspect we must have paid some money out though, especially on Ellis.

Got a serious back injury I believe.

Turner in for Yeamo. Kent in for Pitts. Simples.

he's cack!!