I certainly don't think it's the last we'll hear from it but I do expect that our coach will follow the usual channels, as opposed to whingeing in the media. I thought it was hilarious to hear Sandercock criticising the VR decison for KR to drop out because he "clearly saw" that Briscoe had put the ball dead.

I'm pleased we have a head coach who can keep his emotions in check and knows how to make complaints, I'm also convinced that the way he conducts himself means that any complaint he may have will be listened to with a sympathetic ear.

if kangeroovers got that given as a forward, kangeroovers wouldve not been opn the front foot. simple

His positioning for the (non)try was spot on, where would you suggest he stands, 30 metres above the play? That close to the line a referee will always be in the in-goal. Even from head-on, it was an obvious forward pass but it was a line call and the TJ should have given it. Now whether he did and Ganson refused to acknowledge it, is a whole different ball game.

Define "blatant" and you might be getting somewhere. We've scored enough points from forward passes in the past and will score many more in the future.

Stop looking for someone else to blame for our inability to defend against Hodgson's 2nd try, you know, the one that actually lost us the game.

Yes I'm suggesting he levitates

Refs will not always be in that position at all.

if that kangeroovers "try" wasn't given, then kangeroovers wouldn't have had the wind in there sails

We lost by 2. Dobson's try was worth 4. I'd say the decision to award that try cost us the game.

Part of me can't help but wonder is he was 'evening' this out after the Dobson sinbinning.

Only the officials to blame. They do their job the game is ours. 50/50 I can live with, 3 yards forwards is inexcusable.

wikepedia... ganson= female clown
wikepedia...what do you call a female clown
answer.......a clunt......

It's all irrelevant anyway. Decisions like that make the game exciting according to Eddie Hemmings. And we wonder why we will always be a minority sport.

How blatant would you like your forward passes? Short of donnin a helmet, shoulder pads and Leeds Rhinos shirt and launching the fckin thing down the field how much more blatant does it get?

I appreciate the passion of the moment may have clouded your obvious inability to comprehend the answer I had given to a specific post but, for the sake of clarity I'll make another attempt.

He suggested that a video referee should be able to adjudicate on "blatant" forward passes, all I asked him to do was define "blatant".

By the way, I belive that calling the Dobson try as a blatant forward pass is not debatable, what I was asking for is a definition of "blatant", so we could get a semblance of consistency, otherwise what some may call blatant may not be as blatant to others.

Happy? Or shoudl they just be called "blatant" when they're against us?

if the hands are pointing forward to pass, the blantant forward....not hard is it

Try looking at the Laws of the Game, read the section on forward passes and then come back with something approaching a coherent statement.