Seymour would be a setback if it were him .

"stalling" might mean "waiting" to see who the replacement coach was going to be.

Maybe Agar's said it too upset the applecart !

Doubtful it will be either McKinnon or Seymour as neither are getting first team Rugby

We really can't afford to lose Seymour if it turned out to be him.
Although I think this will turn out to be bollox, and expect all of them to be here next season.

If its heremaia it's not to much of a setback , with obst been here . It does say a new recruit but then does that free a full overseas spot up for a centre or forward .

Could be McKinnon nobody knows what his relationship is like with Gentle and also I don't believe they have a full back for next year after letting him go thinking they had Moltzen but he signed for the dragons. Maybe he has been offered to stay. I'm sure we will soon find out if it's true or not.

can you actually 'stall' on a deal once youve signed it? id be suprised if you could....if agar would have gone mid season,would they be able to leave then? sounds like b0ll0cks to me..

If a players attitude is one of i don`t want to play for you unless Agar is head coach, then you`ve got to ask yourself if that is the type of player you would want at your club, to me if that is the case it would be a case of goodbye and good riddance.

I may be wrong, but isn't that what Carvell did?

Am I the only one who wouldn't be too disappointed if it was all three of them?

They're all decent players but all signed under the old regime. Call me an optimist but with a new ambitious owner who has stated he will target contracted players and now a new coach, it wouldn't bother me if we had a second chance to recruit our 1,7 & 9 again and potentially aim for higher.

and a young Mr Radford

My apoligies for the use the word "stall". The article states that one of Hull's 2012 antipodean recruits is now considering not coming following the departure of Agar.

Have you seen the rest of SL overseas recruitment?

Keep Phelps if its McKinnon.