I completely agree.

Because it wouldn't change anything this season.

Thing is, we can't rush the finding of the right replacement. It HAS to be the right man this time, and that's not an immediate thing. Also, who's going to advise Pearson on this?

I reckon someone in a consultancy role until the end of the season and then all change in November.

It wouldn't change anything with regards to our league position, but it might at least boost the gates a bit.

The problem is that this isn't the first time it's happened. We have gone in at halftime numerous times leading and after an Agar motivated halftime team talk a completely different team emerge from the dressing room, somethings not quite right.

It may and it might halt the decline in the support.

No Cup win over a Super League team since July 2008 and no play off win since 2007. Shocking.

Another season wasted, hopefully Pearson will replace him as Bones said by November so the new coach can work with the squad for the pre-season.

Fair point, but I don't think Pearson would be unreasonable enough to Agar to only give him one game.

Rather we had to stick with agar a few more games if it means we take out time and get the right man

No but it would make the people who forked out £100s for season passes feel better, jesus we have to face Wigan, Wire & Cats yet we may as well have a caretaker coach at least then we know that Pearson is searching for a coach and there is light at the end of then tunnel.

This has got to be the crux of the matter for Pearson assuming he's bought us as an investment.

Would it really be unreasonable to give him one game? He's been in charge for 3 years and even a new owner has to take his record during that time into account.

He looked distinctly unimpressed in the occasional shot of him that the BBC showed. Reckon it was crossing his mind at least.

Just hang on Mo.

I have for some time been advocating losing our coach, however its now only a few weeks left to the seasons end and sacking him now will achieve very little but appease most of us. We have new owners and maybe, just maybe there has been some " interference" from the old board in coaching matters. The new owner has limited knowledge on the game, I know he likes the game and has watched for some time. He is in no position to stick his two pennyworth in like some of our retiring board almost certainly did and Rich may, may just be able to "do it his way now"

This season is now all, but over we can make the eight may as well let Agar have a run at it now and give him until the end of the season to see if things improve or not. There can then be no doubt as to his capacity as head coach, its his team and he runs it with no one sticking there/her nose in.

Not at all, of course it has to do with the coach but no player should need motivating for that game.....agar has to go end of...i think people think im defending him,im not just think the players really screwed it up today.