play nice little one

Just stating facts. You have been on here with more speculation than anyone else and the majority of it is wrong.

But if your answer to the poll question is YES. Surely going to the game to protest during is counter-productive. Can't protests be organised post or pre match? Or do you think the lack of support or apathy towards your cause is to great?

Always want FC to win !!!!

I always want us to win but the current situation, where we win one in every 3 or 4 is worst case scenario as every time there's some pressure on the board the team win and he's OK for the next couple of abysmal defeats

Firstly I wont be at the game as I feel I will get better entertainment watching the Sky game. I also agree protests should be before and after a game. I never protested during the game on Sunday I got behind my team which I will always do. I will accept protests during a game if the game is lost and we are playing our usual poor rugby though.
You are probably picking the wrong person to have this discussion with, I am not the type of supporter who will try and force others to agree with my view, I think everyone has the right to their own opinion. I don't think a banner is forcing someone to have your opinion, IE if someone had put up an Agar In banner on Sunday I would not have been moaning about it.

Bit of a generous statement that

The poll stats seem to think that folk do not want their team to loose... end of story..

And that has what to do with my statement? Is there actually any point quoting me and then talking about something completely different? If you can point me to where I said I think the majority would want the team to lose or were i have said i want the team to lose it would be appreciated.

I agree but I want a change of head coach and I would like it 'sooner rather than later', however with what has 'come out from the club' it would seem that I will have to put up with what we have.

Well put. I would also like to add that I am a little bothered by the 'banner incident' on Sunday. I did not go to the match, but I have read what others has said about the incident & if what has been reported is/was correct I think that the Hull club. have 'crossed the line'.
Provided things are done correctly, people should be allowed to express both pleasure and displeasure when the need arises.If the banners etc were in support of the club would there have been the same response? [ apology if I have gone slightly away from the topic].

I think this topic is a valid one.

Although I never want my team to lose from the kick off, I found myself in summat of a quandary on Sunday after three quarters or so of the game.

I feel we'll never progress under Agar so am keen to see him move on.

So after 60 mins or so of the game, when Quins went 30-16 up and I thought the game was gone, I felt that the club would have to finally put him out of his and the fans' suffering.

When Hull clawed their way back and eventually won the game, I was pleased but with a slight tinge of regret at a possible missed opportunity.

Call it short term pain for long term gain if you like.