50/50 call IMO. Without my FC glasses on I would say it went backwards.

I meant that the ref said it was a knock on and he had played the advantage.

I'll have to watch it again as I didn't hear the ref say that on Sky last night.

the ref doesn't say it but it is implied by Hemmings - they are often tipped the wink by the officials.

To take advantage, you have to have possession of the ball, which calderwood never did. It was the wrong decision.

Someone suggested that it went backwards. It didn't!

One which did go backwards was one which Tansey spilled whilst facing his own line yet that was pinged as a knock on???????

Wrong.

It went forward off his right hand.

You dont mate, you either have to cross the gain line or make a play that could result in advantage which he tried for

like i said, would people have been happy with a no try decision if he had of grounded it

By that definition any player who collected the ball from an opposition knock on is making a play which could result in advantage. I haven't looked at the official rules, but I would have thought common sense would state for advantage to be taken you have to have possession of the ball.

If he had grounded the ball, he would have had possession / not knocked it on. Why would it have resulted in a No Try decision?

Fair enough

How about when the ball is knocked on and a player kicks on to try and dive on the ball over the Try line? If they subsequently knock-on or the ball goes dead the play never gets brought back for the first knock-on does it?

Taken from the rules: "ADVANTAGE allowing the advantage means allowing play to proceed if it is to the advantage of the team which has not committed an offence or infringement."

How precisely did Hull gain an advantage from this? Rather than a scrum 10 metres from the line we faced a 20 metre restart taken by the team which had committed an infringement.

I can't believe I'm even concerned with any of this. The number of decisions like this are too numerous to mention and, regardless of if the ref was right or wrong, he had a very good game overall and allowed both teams to put on a real show for us and the impartials.

Thought the ref got that wrong to be honest, Briscoe and Latus made a right mess of it and then Calderwood went to get the ball but never had control of it so there was never an advantage, should of been a Hull scrum.

Just to play devils advocate then.

Your given a choice of either

a) a scrum on the opposition 10 meter line

or

b) your winger having an unchallenged run onto a ball trickling over the try line

Which do you choose as its more "advantageous"?

I repeat...

"ADVANTAGE allowing the advantage means allowing play to proceed if it is to the advantage of the team which has not committed an offence or infringement."