sorry, I must have forgotten where I announced I was a players agent.

I thought every man and his dog wanted to play for the mighty Richard Agar?

I'd rather we promoted from within than keep a plodding head shaker like Radford.

Have to disagree with that. Most of Radford's 'bad press' with fans is down to him playing a role he wasn't suited for IMO. That and the fact that he isn't really on-field captain material. He's had a better reception this season with the burden of the captaincy removed and playing at prop.

He's a hard worker and does some things very well. He does other things badly. Overall I'm not too unhappy with one more year from him.

And overrated by others.

Excellent post! a lot of his "bad press" as you put it was clearly down to being in a position that wasnt suited to his style whereas prop suits him down to the ground and he has clearly had a great season so far in that role, as for the captaincy to Lee its a matter of leading from the front in RL rather than the pycops role ala Fitz but one which Lee has done time after time when it gets rough !!
Well worth another contract , and at the end of the day who is there to replace him thats better

This has been nailed on for weeks along with Dowes on a 2 year deal. I am happy with Radford at prop, he takes the ball up well and hits hard. It's noticeable he is playing better rugby this year whilst playing at prop and getting spelled so he does not have to play so many minutes.

One year is right for me.

Is it better to have Radford on the island, or paddling in the sea?

signed new 1 year deal bbc sport website

Isnt that a lot of fans mis-understanding the role he played then? Radford played prop last season whether named at 13 or 8. Is it just that some fans dont understand that and expected different things off him when named at 13?

That sums up the stupidity of Agar of play a prop at loose forward.

I dont agree with the tactic of playing a prop at 13 but i do think it sums up more the stupidity of some fans to not realise that the team dynamic has changed and that loose forward isnt a ball handler in our gameplan. Fitz is a prop too. Sadly Radders doesnt perform at the level Fitz does and doesnt have the career reputation that Fitz has otherwise he might not have been called crap by some fans for the last 2 years.

Would agree with that, Kosh.

Radders has done a decent job this season so far.

IMO he doesn't have the game to figure at 13 regardless of the changes to the role over the years. You still need a bit more mobility and craft than he has now, and also the ability to play more minutes. Not his fault that he was asked to play there but his effectiveness was much less than when playing a 'traditional' propping role as he is now.

Have to agree with that assessment of him as a 13/prop. What I do think is good is that he has stepped into a true prop's role this year and, in his first year , is doing a very good job.