Not at all. I always try to argue a balanced view on here. Some will agree and some will disagree. Nothing wrong with that. I can easily understand how many are disillusioned with Hull FC both on and off the field. Argue your case by all means. Unfortunately for you your argument generally degenerates into name calling and such like, hence my original post in this thread. Calling people 'idiots' if they don't agree with you is hardly going to win many debating prizes. It's generally the tactic of someone who's lost the argument.

But without the same detailed knowledge you feel you can comment on somene's abilty to execute their responsibilities? Interesting.

thackerygate
reardongate
blundersidegate

and you know all the facts behnd those issues?

Obviously not, do you?

I know a few things that are not in the public domain, yes.

But to Quote Rule you have to "stand by your moves" he took the flack for Thacks, and nowt happened. If the club had any brains he would have walked, or be pushed.

Come to think of it, he would not have got the job in first place.

Feel free to enlighten us

Which part of "not in the public domain" do you not get?

Cough

I said from the beginning that it wasn't information that is in the public domain, I'm hardly going to betray cofidences and start posting things on here. There are a number of people that know the same information from different sources.

Anyway, keep prattling on about how crap Rule is when you don't even really understand his role a the club, or his abilities to fulfill it.

Yet you want him to reveal his company's name?

Will you reveal yours?

Is the club in a better postition now than it was when he took over?

It's not relevant to this conversation, the fact I have managed stadia and been involved with major sporting events is, which is the position from which I am commenting.

So you have done every job on the planet!

You must be sooooo old!