I Agree, it really is a joke that barring Berrigan we don't have any playmakers that are better than average at creating things.

There obviously needs to be some flexibility. It would only be a rough guide to when I think we should be giving players a breather

Agar has tried changing things around but the problem is he just hasn't changed anything else such as the game plan etc. Anyway, if R.Horne is back and Reardon is available too then I would go for:

Reardon
Calderwood
Hall (kicker for this game)
Yeaman
Broughton
Washbrook
R.Horne
Dowes
Lee
Thackray
Burnett
Radford
Whiting

Moa
Maloney
Manu
Berrigan

I feel that Tickle has been very average and feel that the 3 second rowers named are better at the moment (judging Burnett on form before his injury, but looked quite good on Friday too). I also don't see what G.Horne has been adding to the team either at the moment (although he did O.K on the wing at St's) added to the fact I want to see Hall back at centre. If Reardon is out then I would put Hall back to 1 and G.Horne at centre.Thorman has to be dropped. He is terrible and Washbrook showed more in the first half than Thorman has since Bradford away. Berrigan has looked better coming off the bench in the past two games and feel Lee looked very dtermined in the past 3 games and would prefare him to start at the moment

i dont see the point of interchanging forwards at half time

The main thing that has got to change is loose man. We are currently too easy to defend against and this is partly due to playing an extra prop at 13.
I think Washbrook did enough last Friday to warrant another starting spot and if Horne is fit again, this should be at 13. Our attacking play has got to have more options to keep the opposition defence working. Everyone should be involved in every set of six either with ball in hand or dummy runner. In recent matches too many players see us having possession as a chance to have a rest and wait for the next tackling stint.

I would personally start with Burnett and bring Manu off the bench for impact.

Leeds have struggled for outside backs all season and he has not been in contention once, says it all tbh.

Broughton is as much as a winger as Hall is yet we bring him and play him there. Hall or Horne are way ahead of Broughton and the fact we are picking him is laughable.

Agree about Hall, although Hall is actually pretty good on the wing imo its just not his bets position.
I don't agree about G.Horne been miles ahead of Broughton as a winger.
Watkins, Gibson and Hall are better than Broughton but the first two would get into a fully fit Hull side in the centre anyway, plus Hall is one of the top try scorers this season anyway. Plus Broughton wouldn't get near a full strength Hull side anyway so I don;t really see why you are using that as your argument

My argument is despite injuries to Tony, Raynor and Briscoe we still have better options on the wing than Broughton in both Hall and Horne. For a start they both have more experience and have been playing and training with our squad all season not to mention they have been playing at SL level all season.

Broughton has been brought in to cover in case we get any more injuries, he should not be playing this week.

Reardon (If not ready then Thorman)
Calderwood
Whiting
Yeaman
G.horne
R.horne
Lee
Dowes
Berrigan
King
Burnett
Tickle
Washbrook

Thackray
Maloney
Houghton
Manu

How have you come to the conclusion that G.Horne is a better winger than Borughton? G.Horne has barely played there himself. When he did againat Saints, he got two trys but he didn't exactly play amazingly. Hall should be at centre if Reardon is back, I feel at the moment we need to play to our strengths and Hall at centre is one of them.
While Broughton himself isn't an experienced winger, on Friday he seemed to have the qualities to do a job for us there for a month. The fact that Leeds have better players to cover injuries than him is irrelevant because Leeds have a better squad