Sorry, Chris, that's just nonsense. Lets see your proof.

Go on then, explain the glaring inconsistencies.

I can't explain something that doesn't exist.

Take a look through the disciplinary panels own rap sheets even recent ones from this season alone just an example of inconsistencies: Austin and Dwyer both banned for the same offence that Hurrell committed and was charged with yet no action or ban for Hurrell. Considering the any flexion of the neck was something the RFL made clear would be dealt with firmly how do St’s and Hurrell escape punishment that the RFL have already dished out for the same offence? Also the shove by Lees on Swift caused a huge flexion of the neck but the panel view it as misconduct by Swift for being in the way and lees running through the back of Swift because Lees had his eyes in the ball and didn’t see Swift stood there. Had that been the other way around I’m pretty sure a penalty and card would have been issued as has been shown before. That’s just two from the game without the Roby decision of it being head to arm due to player duckibg yet other occasions have lead to bans for players regardless of opposing player ducking or falling in to the tackle due the the RFL stating tackler has a responsibility blah blah. Then the laughable call by the VR to not just call a penalty in Wynn for making a tackle but then compound it by issuing a yellow card. So in just our game alone on Saturday that’s more than enough inconsistency which is there to see.

It’s this level of not just inconsistency and uneven way clubs and players are dealt with but also the incompetence that begs the question and leads fans to rightly question things.

Take a look at the official stats for penalties/cards. We are pretty average. Most penalised clubs in recent seasons

2021
1 Leeds
2 Wigan
3 Salford
4 St Helens
9 Hull FC

2020
1 Cas
2 Wigan
3 Rovers
4 Wakefield
10 Hull FC

2019
1 Catalans
2 Salford
3 Rovers
4 Warrington
12 Hull FC

2018
1 Huddersfield
2 Catalans
3 Warrington
4 Cas
9 Hull FC

But yes the refs and the RFL hate us.

Leeds players have been dealt with more favourably in previous seasons yes. The two players I’ve used are recent examples of inconsistencies already this season. In Austin & Dwyer both are ones that have committed the same offences as Hurrell and was charged with yet those two players got bans and Hurrell escapes without even though the RFL were deeming these incidents more severely.

No they haven’t.

I haven’t said they hate us. I have simply stated that clubs are not dealt with evenly by the disciplinary when dishing out punishment for offences committed. So stats on the number penalties and cards is pretty irrelevant as doesn’t show the inconsistency of offence v punishment which is the issue for me.

Though you seem to give the impression you think the officials are infallible and perfect and the Wynn penalty snd card was just? That decision alone highlights the poor officiating standard when an onfield ref and VR with the help of reply’s to look at still get and got it so wrong

Gale hasn't a previous good record. He had bans for punching and dissent whilst at Leeds and I'm pretty sure he's got previous from his cas days too.

He played enough games for Leeds to get banned twice? I’m astounded.

Not surprised really, but season could be over by the time we see him again. With so much of our cap invested in the first 17 and so few of them available this was exactly what we didn't need.

No, I never said that and I don't believe it either. If you interpret it that way that's up to you.

I bet Sneyd is laughing his head off.

Have to say if Gale contacts with the ball and he chases it forward,collects and scores under the posts its deemed as a great try.
Small margins