Did you get up at 5am to post you'd be delighted to see Michaels fail? Awesome.

Can anyone give me a legitimate reason for signing him? cus I cant think of any if im honest

Because for years we've lacked genuine pace in the backs and people have said yeaman should be nothing more than a sqad player.add to that the fact we started last year with jason crooks on the wing then signed colbon during the season proves to me if a player like micheals becomes available at the right price who can cover those positions you grab him

Granted, he's nippy, but its another siging that has baggage, hoping that he turns into a diamond, just like talanoa, BUT as ive stated, I cant see him ousting yeaman as it stands, although I believe we should have replaced him a while back also, michaels will be a squad player as far as im concerned, all ill say is, the top teams in superleague wouldn't sign a steve michaels IMO

What baggage? Can't remember reading anything that made me think it had disaster wrote all over it although i stand to be corrected

Worried about Taylor on the basis of this game. Salford look ill prepared and unfit, will go backwards on this showing.

Baggage, I mean issues, played 1 gane in a year due to being on comapssionate grounds, says to me, his heads nott in the rite place, but just my opinion, im no psychiatrist

Good to see that you admit you haven't a clue what you're talking about.

Apparently I didnt know what I was on about when I said fc wouldn't finish in the top 8, I got pelters, but I was proven right, we was awful and failed as I predicted

Pretty much everyone but the totally deluded few predicted we'd be out of the 8 last year

Does the deluded few include our coaching staff and board then? They seemed pretty confident at times

Can see why you or other fans may be concerned but every person goes through those things some time during their life but it does'nt mean they'll never get over it or be unable to do their job again.i quite like what moto and radders are doing transfer wise.they seem to be going for people with a point to prove rather than players who think they've made it just because we'v given them a over the odds contract.god knows we've had enough of them the last few years.radders has played and coached those big time charlies and knew the first thing he had to do as head coach is build a team with a greater strength of character.for years we've all herd the phrase "cancer in the club" , for me i think that attitude was the cancer.hopefully were on our way to a new healthy fighting fit club

If he plays and is a roaring success, ill hold my hands up and admit im wrong, but as ive stated, im very sceptical about this signing, I cant see him playing barring injuries to sa or yeaman, and I believe arundel hasnt been given a fair chance since we signed him, id give him a run if possible due to cap restraints etc

How do you know about Arundel, I bet you have rarely seen him play, certainly not in the flesh which seems to be your argument that you know more about Micheals than anyone else.

Why not give the kid a couple if games before writing him off?

And thats what you get for filling your sock about proclaiming the signing of a player 2 years before he comes.