Better go to specsavers then

To be fair, until everyone has played everyone the league positions aren't a true reflection of how strong any one side is

Everyone has played each other.

Some 3 times with magic.

Yes it was a crap performance it was an ugly win ..But in the passed few years those were the games we would loose..I will be at Bradford cheering the lads on ..going on Monday for tickets from the Club Shop 11 thousand plus wasn't a bad gate for Catalan ..A good turn out

OK, twice (or 3 times)

We've played half of the rest of the league twice and played the other half once. I guess it's the same for most other clubs.

To suggest the league table isn't a true reflection of how strong teams are until the season is over is just bollox.

The table usually takes shape after about half a dozen games. Very rarely will a team either collapse and plummet down the table or suddenly go on a long run and shoot up it. Take us, for example, we've been between 4th and 6th since round six back in March.

Halfway through Hull City's first Premier League season they were in a Europa League place, HTH.

It's not going to change massively but I was posting in response to kosh suggesting us being 4th was evidence we are the 4th best team in SL

Comparing Rugby to football? Really?

We're 4th because at this point of the season we're the 4th best team. It really is that simple.

Yup. Such a simple concept and yet seemingly beyond the grasp of some folk.

Sadly some people appear to resent us being 4th...mental but some of the stuff written on this board is unbelievable

What other evidence is there of how good a team is, apart from results over an extended period? If you shared your factual evidence to the contrary we could compare its robustness to actual match results after 20 odd rounds of the competition.