Let Berro leave and sign Finch.

no didnt say that but they could enquire, and yes i would let fitz go, your telling me if finch was interested, you would not want him, younger, a class act at 6, and a position we despretly need to improve, and on diskin, if he doesnt get a contract offer, or one that he doesnt want then he would have no option, if we get in their and enquire then it would be up to him, does he want his future sorted, or take the chance of waiting for leads to ffer him a new deal.

yeah i would paul, obviously only if finch wants too.

the thing is berro won't be going anywhere.

I think we have to be a bit more ruthless and if they dont fit anymore then get rid. Including Horne, if there is good enough out there.......

if not, then id still let fitz go to get finch, i think it is that important we get a creative half, then to replace fitz, how bout langley, what im saying is their is more options out their then galea, but just my opinion.

problem is no one will pay them what we are

i can't see langley leaving bradford.i do think fitz will go,which will free up a quota,but please not galea.

maybe not, but like you say please not galea.

maybe not, but like you say please not galea.

If we sign galea it will just prove that there is no thought in our recruitment. If he wasn't crocked then rovers would be keeping him. They'll sign him then start bleating about injuries for the next 2 years when he spends most of the time sat in the stands

Unless we have some mystical way of getting him off the quota it will be one of the worst signings (in terms of wasting quota and cap space in relation to what we have and what we need) I have ever witnessed.

We need 'The Brother ' back for the rumours

Oh yes

Spot on - utter tery if true and as a quota player. We've no back line to speak of and 2 completely crocked half backs, so let's sign a knackered quota 2nd rower. Beyond belief.