..... The North Stand holds 4000, so we'd initially be allowed 1000 spectators in there.

That's £30 per head just to break even.

No need to open the North stand, would it be financially prudent to do so in any case?

One row and 3 seats separation is more than enough for those that feel concerned, groups of two households can mix in any case by time the ground is opened to fans so there's no need to separate everyone and thus more than enough space in two if not three stands.

Simply passing people going to the toilets/drink or going to/from your seats is not a transmission thing in any case despite the propaganda by government, but whatever, I won't be one of the ones attending.

ATEOTD the club need to come up with a solution to how they allocate in a fair manner, if there's greater demand than seats available precedence to those with 2 or more from the same household/bubble would surely be prudent in any case.

I wonder how that's going to work, answers on a postcard.....

i see cas want to host a one of the test events for fans back in the ground before may 17th....surely all seater grounds would be more safer for test events , like seats on trains and buses etc, can be taped off and spread out

If it all goes to plan we should get a good crowd for our home Derby fixture then. https://www.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... sky-sports

If it all goes to plan we should get a good crowd for our home Derby fixture then. https://www.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... sky-sports

Well the club has details of those members so will know if people are from the same household/s, maybe the club should take on trust that people sitting together is fine. The 'rule' of six, two households etc isn't law in any case and never has been, hence why the fines handed out by plod are deemed unenforceable, so from a legal standpoint people can sit with whomever they like.
There's massively bigger things to worry about than who sits with whom.

Just for reference, where do you sit in the KCOM?

Mostly East but sometimes South, depends if my brother and/or nephew come along as East has been a bit difficult at some games for 4 seats together, that's due to not being always predict what games I can get down for and tickets not being able to purchase ad hoc that far in advance anyway.

Right now it's rather moot, even if I'd had a full membership -which I've never bought, I wouldn't renew because that has the potential to complicate matters further regards allocation and those far closer/able to get to the majority of games. If I was offered a seat for myself and someone else, of course I'd jump at the chance but given the circumstances those already stumping for a full membership deserve to have first dibs as I said upthread.

Over 40000 capacity can have 10000 otherwise it's it's 4000 or 50% if capacity is below 8000 I believe is what has been published so maximum for RL stadiums at the start of the lifting will be 4k at all grounds. Cannot see any away fans anywhere for some time and still a bit on income on clubs

The club have said and are hopefull of having between 5-6000 fans in the ground


At a guess the club maybe looking at
1000 each in the north and south stands
1500-2000 in the east and west (including upper stand)

Yes stadiums over 40K can have up to 10K but it defines stadiums with a seating capacity of over 16K (of which the KCOM does) as a large venue so comes under the 25% of capacity rule. So in theory 25% of the KCOM capacity is up to 6000 able to attend. There is only Hull FC, Huddersfield & Wigan I believe that have stadiums that can be classed as large venues with a seating capacity of over 16K.

Cheers for clearing that one up sorry if I confused the situation

No worries at all :