Like I said I would have kept him on for another year if he's dirt cheap however if he's been offered a contract from another club where he's on considerably more (like Wheeldon last year) than I wouldn't match the offer. I think he's too light going forward and with Dowes, O'Meley, Yak, Luaiki with Radford/Fitz capable of doing a front row job that's 6 players in front of him not to mention the possibility of Moa/Cordobra being here next season and maybe even King.

Why are we looking at signing players from the Eels....




























































































instead of the Roosters

Not alot, but certainly have more playing and coaching experience then the so called experts on here claiming it would be a mistake to release Maloney.

Most said the same about Andy Bailey, lets be honest how many players have Hull released over the last few years that has come to regret. (I can think of one).

That's mainly because his replacement is so poor rather than how much we miss him.

[sizeYou do mean Webster, don't you?[/size

Yup. Looks like a good player although i'll admit ive never heard of him. Would be good if he impresses to keep him on for next season off quota.

And to think alot of you guys on here thought it was a good deal to get rid of Wheeldon and replace him with Maloney.

Whats that got to do with this arguement. Maloney already looks a better player than Scott!

for the money it was at the time.

scott was asking for more than we could afford/wanted to pay him. Maloney has performed as well in his limited performances this year as Wheeldon performed in his last year

I still dont rate Wheeldon, personally I dont think either are good enough to make a top prop in SL, Wheeldon certainly wasnt worth the money he wanted.

Not worth the money he wanted and he is hardly pulling up trees at CP either.

Cordoba Arrives Thursday but Tickle has broken his wrist!

We got Moa aswell. Two for the price of one.

Scott wanted double the amount we were paying him, Rovers paid it, perhaps we should have launched a £60 elitist members scheme to fund it?