Like the sound of that , Sneyd/Lomax , good call

Said it before but great business by the club to secure him for 3 more years given he was OOC with other suitors. If he'd gone I can't think of another realistic target to match him seeing that we're not in the marquee player game.

I think Clarke was comparing him to Jane Austen.

What and you don't think Sneyd will be on or as near too marquee money with his new contract?
Why do you think negotions were protracted?

2 posts in a week, both involving me, nothing about the win at Cas. You had a bit to say about Powell's exciting brand of rugby so I look forward to the praise of Radford in equal measure shortly.



I imagine we are paying a lot for Sneyd, of course, back to my point of recognising his value in a landscape bereft of match winning OOC scrum halfs. If we can pay him big money and keep a squad challenging on both fronts without using marquee dispensation then all credit to the club.

Firstly get over yourself, you don't mean that much to me and all it was, was a reply in context of the topic, it could have been made to anyone.
I do find your cretinous inflammatory riposte and need for attention and drama tedious to say the least, as do many people I'm sure.

I'd been at work on a late shifts all week and didn't watch the Cas game until Saturday morning and whilst very impressed with our performance especially in the 2nd half I didn't feel the need to post on that thread just to repeat what had already been said or to satisfy you and your prerequisite posting amount and required statements.
So in summary there was of course no need for your first paragraph which was intended to be confrontational in it's very nature.

Back on topic (if I'm allowed to reply without you thinking it's about you

)

We are paying a lot for Sneyd and Jones alike hence why we are trimming down the squad.
Sneyd knows his value and was after what he thought he was worth in the current climate.
Obviously the club have satisfied his demands.

Did you work a lot of extra late shifts in 2016/2017?

It's getting like 2016. Praise and criticise in equal measure is your mantra honey bun, that can't be denied



On Sneyd I was pointing out great work by the club to keep him in the context that there are few match winners on the market. Of course we will have paid him well but if he'd been lured away my point was that there don't appear to be an embarrassment of half back riches in SL for us to try and replace him with. His stock is rising I would say since he signed.

Oh dear, no independent train of thought and having to jump on the bandwagon are you? Truly pathetic.
You are really Barista and I claim a further £5.

Maybe we are the same person. Only I/we know for sure...

No, no, no, I'm Mrs B, he said so a few days ago, what an obnoxious individual he is.

I do find his cretinous inflammatory riposte and need for attention and drama tedious to say the least, as do most people I'm sure.

I wonder what insults he'll come up with next.

4 from 4. There's no need for personal attacks like this, just be nice please. The question was really about the lack of potential replacements for Marc Sneyd had he been lured back West. The fact we are likely to have paid a premium reflects the market but also other factors perhaps that meant he wanted to stay. Stability of coaching set up possibly.