Brett's not having a good time of it at the moment, hope his is going to be OK.

There where seventeen players on duty Saturday night, one was not the cause of it. I just welcomed back season 2009/2010/2011 &2012 and look forward to re-visiting them again anytime soon. The problem we have is not enough options in attack and with what we have there will be no improvement long term just odd matches. Some of our players are becoming a liability and to be frank I wonder how the heck we sighed them


I hope Brett is alright and makes a full recovery soon, its just not happening for the guy at the moment

OK let's look at what you wrote again ...

"[iMental health is a serious issue, he's been struggling for a while. Obviously he's been mis-managed over here or he wouldn't be in the mess he is. Your stance is ignorant, at best.[/i"

So breaking it down ...

"[iMental health is a serious issue, he's been struggling for a while[/i."

How do you know this unless you're party to his medical history ? I'd lay a big bet that you're not - in fact you're IGNORANT of his medical history like the rest of us but feel it OK to medically diagnose someone and accuse someone else of themselves being ignorant."

"[iObviously he's been mis-managed over here or he wouldn't be in the mess he is[/i."

Interesting cause and effect analysis based on zero factual evidence. Again you have absolutely no clue of this - you're IGNORANT of it to use another term - first of all of what 'mess he might be in' and secondly - if there is a mess - what the cause might be.



You pretended to know cause and effect of something you're clueless about - I simply pointed this out.
The only high horse here is the one you're riding - and doing so whilst being totally ignorant of the facts. Who knows you might even be right but you have no clue that you are and that was what prompted me to reply to you post.

Your first snippet proves you haven't understood what I wrote. It's all bollox.

Explain it then - if you meant something else tell me what you meant.

Well done on making yourself look like a complete d**k.

The first part was a general statement. Seymour is struggling, I implied it, I didn't state it as fact.

Rugby takes a back seat,I hope Seymour is ok and makes a full recovery.

So, because Seymour is 'struggling', it's ok for you to imply that he has a mental health problem? And anyone who doesn't accept this implication is ignorant?

You also said that it was 'obvious' that he'd been mis-managed, and that he wouldn't be 'in the mess' he's in had he not been. That is just idle speculation. For a start, we don't know that he was 'in a mess' prior to his car crash, just that he wasn't playing at all well. And unless you are privy to the inner-workings of the club - unless you have been present for every conversation between PG/AP and Seymour -it is far from 'obvious' what has transpired.

I'm assuming Brett was the only person involved and no other party was injured?

Pleased he's able to be released from hospital - some of the rumours flying around about his injuries were pretty scary.

Gardening leave?

Not arrested by the looks of it.
Good news if so.