Can't remember seeing half of Leeds' pack being suspended? What happened?

It's called being injured.

They got suspended for being injured? Seems harsh!

Who said anything about them being suspended?? Jake mentioned nothing like this happens to teams playing us, i then pointed out that Leeds were missing a similar amount when they played us and even more when two got injured.

How many of Leeds' injuries happened 3 days before the game?
Injuries are an unfortunate regular part of the game, suspensions for breaches for discipline aren't. So the two aren't really comparable.

It is comparable when roughly the same amount of first teamers are missing from a game. Regardless of injury or discipline it still means you are not playing the full strength 17.

Its not just about the numbers missing from the actual game though is it? I would imagine the Crusaders have trained and prepared for the Rovers game with the majority of the 7 suspended involved. To have to bring in fringe first teamers and youngsters 48 hours before the game is the worst kind of preperation.

Rovers should win by plenty on Saturday.

But Leeds were expecting to have them players missing. What about Harris' gameplan? It would have included them players! What about the youngsters who are now being told they're playing 3 days before the game? I don't see much comparison.

surely that depends what they were suspended for, what if it was for missing training?

Chris Hill from leigh ? Playing well tonight and in a few games I've seen

Definately the best forward outside super league. James Taylor is good too. I couldnt believe he was only 23 when they said. He's been around years.

Harris doesn't have a gameplan have you watched Crusaders play at all this season

Signed for Warrington

Sorry if already posted but have heard rumours Hudds will annouce Moa on two year deal shortly.