You're forgetting Silverwoods' Non forward, forward pass down in the Hollow.

Sorry guys but surely the game was lost with the lack of completed sets, Rovers completed twice as much and as such had twice as much possession !!!
They scored twice as much in the last 40 with said possession!!
It's a bitter pill to swallow but in this game there were many bad calls, dobbos sin bin, knock on under FCs posts given back to FC but it's now done!!
Seem to remember FC scoring from a blatent forward pass against Leeds only a few weeks ago!!
But guess that was ok, FC ballsed it up and Rovers played to the hooter

Which try was that?

Leeds first try was forward and the pass to Webb wasn't, but I don't remember a forward pass in Hulls tries

no point discussing with a moron, Dobson walked and quite rightly, professional fouls aplenty.

More or less, yes. Other possibilities exist but with much lower statistical probabilities.

i thought it was slightly harsh tbh. but understand why he was sent off

Moron??
Ok If my opinion is not the same as yours then I'm a Moron, seen players laying on far more ( even 3rd players in the tackle ) all weekend and every week, by the book he should have walked but I feel he was hard done to, as a moron I also retract my twice the sets and possession statement

You sure thats in the rules??

No doubt it was forward and a poor decision,but I keep asking the same question,what is the purpose of touch judges,match after match they run up and down the touchline and do nothing.It wasn't gansons call,he may have suspected it was forward and he looked at the touch judge for help and got nothing.Everybody is having a go at ganson,but the real culprit was the touch judge,he simply has not done his job.!

the thing that gets me is how unfit all of the officials are, they seem like they'd struggle to play bowls twice a week, let alone officiate a multi million pound sport. Russ Abbot had slimmer and fitter dancers than Ganson.

[jacko1 wrote

I'm notan expert on the rules by any means but in a pre-season summary/intro to rugby league (I think it was sky not BBC) it was definately stated that the Doctor can be identified by his red shirt (rather than the physio's orange ones) and as soon as he enters the field of play the game must be stopped. It stuck in my memory as I thought it was a ready made recipe for abuse.

Now you are talking like a complete 2@.

Ganson was closer to Hodgson, when he went over, than any of our players

Ganaon may be public enemy no. 1 in Hull but for me the above is the true position.

On Field policy guidelines allow the doctor on the field when the game is in progress. If the doctor goes on when the game is in progress because of a situation, the game should be stopped, but the medics must try to attract the attention of the officials to stop the game. Bear in mind in this case that the stretcher and the full medical pack was also taken out onto the field; that should have been just cause to stop the game.

So would I, we would have won the game then.