I'm sure there'll be a snivelling snitch emailing the RFL to appeal that it shouldn't be allowed.

He was on the team sheet - that always used to be classed as selected to play, even if a non-playing sub. I hope the club have done due diligence on this. I would hate to be expelled from the cup - that's now the penalty.

Miloudi and Connor definitely sounds the way to go. Let Miloudi take over from what Kelly does in terms of providing a ball playing threat but also a big running threat.
Hoping Radder's comments about Carlos in the halves are just to keep Fev guessing.

Bit of a funny one this..only three subs named on the Toronto bench...no Westerman www.skysports.com/rugby-league/k ... onto/49520

Bit of a funny one this..only three subs named on the Toronto bench...no Westerman www.skysports.com/rugby-league/k ... onto/49520

Quote Stanley Unwin="Stanley Unwin"Bit of a funny one this..only three subs named on the Toronto bench...no Westerman www.skysports.com/rugby-league/k ... onto/49520'" .... only 13 names in total.

Quote Stanley Unwin="Stanley Unwin"Bit of a funny one this..only three subs named on the Toronto bench...no Westerman www.skysports.com/rugby-league/k ... onto/49520'" .... only 13 names in total.

Doh! Never noticed that

id be gobsmacked if the club hasnt had clearance from the rfl to say its ok for westy to play

Quote Stanley Unwin="Stanley Unwin"Bit of a funny one this..only three subs named on the Toronto bench...no Westerman www.skysports.com/rugby-league/k ... onto/49520'" He was named here: [urlhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/match/ERLP4063576[/url As I've said, I really really hope we've looked into this thoroughly as it'd be a really poop way to exit the cup!!

Quote Stanley Unwin="Stanley Unwin"Bit of a funny one this..only three subs named on the Toronto bench...no Westerman www.skysports.com/rugby-league/k ... onto/49520'" He was named here: [urlhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/match/ERLP4063576[/url As I've said, I really really hope we've looked into this thoroughly as it'd be a really poop way to exit the cup!!

Well you wouldn't think they would go ahead with this unless they are super confident - after all everyone's favourite pathetic, sad loser Andy unreasonable will no doubt have contacted the RFL already.

After all this he might not even end up playing anyway. We all know that the named squad doesn't mean much these days.

I've heard we took westy's word for it that he didn't play and haven't checked with the RFL

behave, that doesn't actually mean that according to the RFL he didn't 'play', I'd far rather the club simply contact the RFL and ask is Westerman cup-tied, yes or no.
If he plays and subsequently even though he may not have played on the day the ruling is based upon named in match day 17 then that's a costly error in judgement, worse than the oversight previously.