Absolutely spot on.

Yeah, that's how it is once we get near the opposition's line. For the first 60-70 metres though it is predominantly one pass, one tackle, one man rugby. Until we're a couple of scores+ down with less than 15 to go, of course.

But I don't mind that because we do make good yards and create field position for ourselves. One man rugby might not be the most exciting thing to watch but it does work if you can then go through the gears when you get in an attacking position. If we manage to get it in first it's a miracle.

Really awful tonight, totally clueless on attack. Radford has to go and soon.

what i meant was that rovers made quite a lot of errors and turned the ball over to us on halfway or just inside their half several times. despite being granted this useful ball we did nothing of note with it in attack, and even the try we scored from a rovers mistake was highly debatable. as one other poster said, as long as rovers didn't make any one on one missed or misreads, they were never likely to concede

its quite shocking though to think a team playing us only has to have one good half (and leeds did similar) and they win the game comfortably

Look, before tge game i said, rovers will score 20+.. history states this season that they will.... we wont score 20, and history states weve scored 20 only twice this year if my records are correct.... its no surprise to me that we lost, we was lucky to score 6.... scorless AGAIN i 2nd half, and without a rovers mistake, we'd have scored 0 tlinight

Hit the nail on the head there.

Radford should walk. You can take the lad of east hull but you can't take the east hull of of the lad.

Sooo predictable. Repeat sets, totally blunt in attack. Some comical PTBs. Keep thinking we're rock bottom but a way to go yet I feel. Was Pryce's "try" even a try?

To hear my 71 year old father who's been going for 62 years say it's the worst he's seen..says it all for me

That was right up there with performances from the Peter Walsh era.
We are absolutely awful and the book stops with Radford, that play in the second half, 15 metres or so from their line when Thompson drove it in on the sixth summed it up for me, completely clueless.
Or how about near our own line when the ball was played and we nearly lost it because Houghton had his back turned chatting to another player.
Or how about Cunningham been kept away from dummy half and was basically stood like a spare part not knowing what was going on. I could go on and on.
If we can see it why can't Pearson? The entire coaching staff should be fired after that inept insult of a performance.

Could hear Radford shouting from where we were sat, he was fuming. We must have the flattest attack in the league. No depth, too predictable, every set finishing off with a high kick. Shauls break was the only entertaining decent bit of play, the rest of the attack was awful. Could hear Radford getting angry over rankin for opting to kick and not attack the line. He slammed his fist onto his table as well later on in the game

If it wasn't so tragic it'd be funny but we got the penalty in the second half on their 20 and after 5 tackles we were back on the same spot.

I lost count of the number of times we ran it on the 5th and turned it over easily