What he said.

The battery on my phone was almost flat so I couldn't give any today!



We were pretty terrible today, Rovers ran harder and faster, I thought their 10 (Griffin) was by far the best player on the pitch.

They're in for extra training tomorrow night too, so the coaches weren't impressed either.

Wrigglesworth did well and scored a good try.

It was simply a case of every single Rovers player being better than their opposite number today. Beat us in every department.

Though Shaul was better than Sherriffe - who dropped 2 and let a kick off bounce out. But the rest I completely agree with. Think Radders has found his level!

Didn't Sheriffe score 2 or 3 today. Set the ball rolling by out jumping Shaul for the 1st try under the sticks. Agree that Shaul was our only decent player today.

Agreed, it was only his second ever game of RL too, I think once he gets to know the game a bit more he'll make a good full back.

Was men v. boys. Their forwards making easy metres throughout. We played most of the game with ony one half didn't we?

Interesting that Lineham didn't play.

Quite surprising scoreline in one sense. Our U20s were 4th in the table this morning with 19 points, Rovers were 11th with 8 points having played a game more. Rovers motivation in derbies is simply miles better than ours.

We had Green, Bowden, Kent, Cunningham, Crooks, Lynne, Briscoe (out on dual reg) Pearce (left) missing for one reason or another. Meaning our less established players were playing, and as such, it was men against boys.

Bowden and Cunningham played

The team-sheet wasn't entirely accurate - James Green was Rovers number 10.

Agree, he was the best player on the pitch. Fantastic prospect.

Rovers' bigger, stronger and faster across the board.

On paper, Rovers were always going to win well against younger opponents (Radford aside) with Peterson, Sherriff, Ollett and Heil all looking a cut above their Hull FC counterparts.