quote from ganson.: if you cut me do i not bleed?
hull fc fan: yea.. red and white.
should have gone to specsavers....

It would never have got to the point that it did if Ganson & his officials had made the right call.

People calling Ganson an idiot are wrong that would mean he has no idea what he is doing when he clearly does as he does this almost every game when the TV is on him. Yet when it's not IMO he is the best ref in the game. He just likes the attention i bet he gets of on it tbh and will enjoy himself when he gets back to his Hotel room late at night.

The thing is his positioning for the pass was horrific he was stood near enough on the dead ball line. Houghton and Russell ended up giving up on trying to get a penalty for their markers not standing square in the second half.

As wound up as I'am at tossing away a 14 point lead, I think its a complete embarrassment to the game that forward passes like that go undetected. With Monday night RL aimed at spreading the word, any newcomer tuning in today will consider it a joke that with a video ref the try still stands. If it was like union and the ref asked the video ref if there is any reason not to award the try then blatant forward passes would be picked up. The 50/50s would stay with the infield officials.

I certainly don't think it's the last we'll hear from it but I do expect that our coach will follow the usual channels, as opposed to whingeing in the media. I thought it was hilarious to hear Sandercock criticising the VR decison for KR to drop out because he "clearly saw" that Briscoe had put the ball dead.

I'm pleased we have a head coach who can keep his emotions in check and knows how to make complaints, I'm also convinced that the way he conducts himself means that any complaint he may have will be listened to with a sympathetic ear.

if kangeroovers got that given as a forward, kangeroovers wouldve not been opn the front foot. simple

His positioning for the (non)try was spot on, where would you suggest he stands, 30 metres above the play? That close to the line a referee will always be in the in-goal. Even from head-on, it was an obvious forward pass but it was a line call and the TJ should have given it. Now whether he did and Ganson refused to acknowledge it, is a whole different ball game.

Define "blatant" and you might be getting somewhere. We've scored enough points from forward passes in the past and will score many more in the future.

Stop looking for someone else to blame for our inability to defend against Hodgson's 2nd try, you know, the one that actually lost us the game.

Yes I'm suggesting he levitates

Refs will not always be in that position at all.

if that kangeroovers "try" wasn't given, then kangeroovers wouldn't have had the wind in there sails

We lost by 2. Dobson's try was worth 4. I'd say the decision to award that try cost us the game.

Part of me can't help but wonder is he was 'evening' this out after the Dobson sinbinning.

Only the officials to blame. They do their job the game is ours. 50/50 I can live with, 3 yards forwards is inexcusable.

wikepedia... ganson= female clown
wikepedia...what do you call a female clown
answer.......a clunt......