I don't think anyone wants tickle to go nor is any one saying crookes should replace him.

Think we'll part company with Galea at the end of the year, he's a great player and we miss him when he's not playing, which unfortunately he is a fair bit, but age will start catching up with him and best to get rid sooner rather than when its too late.

I'd be shocked if he goes to you lot for a lot of the reasons above, suppose he does give utility as he can cover 2nd row, 13 and 6 but think you have utility in abundance. If you did sign him then injures wuld not be down to bad luck, just inevitable.

Seriously there have been some crap rumours on this messageboard but this is down there with the worst of them. It ain't happening.

I thought he'd at least get a year extention with you tbh.

Not the worst idea i've heard and should be playing there for Rovers imo.

He has definitely spoken to you, the outcome i dont know...younger than Fitzgibbon, can play more positions then him and Rovers best player..not the worst signing ever if it happens..

Agree!

If I were Morgan then Galea would be playing 6 every week now Cooke is not there.

Front rowers yes , Back rowers we're full.

Only cos theyre no fecker else to play there

Only point in signing Galea would be if Fitz was not staying but if that was the case I would rather chase a younger player than Galea from Aus.

have you forgot about Webster or cockayne?

out of all the ooc quota players in world rugby league he'd be right near the bottom of the list, just because we don't need a back rower

Strong rumour was that he was Hudds bound.

Saying that, if we did lose Fitz and wanted a 13 Galea is a pretty good option imo. I'd rather use Washy to keep a quota place free though.

So Fitz is not stayting then 2.75341796875:10